Meghalaya High Court
WP(C)/82/2025 of KARUNA KANTA RABHA Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 4 ORS. on 23 April 2026
No.03 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C). No. 82 of 2025 Date of Decision: 23.04.2026 Shri. Karuna Kanta Rabha S/o:- Late Jakson Rabha R/o:- Village: Manikganj, P.): Manikganj District: - North Garo Hills, Meghalaya. …Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Meghalaya,
Serial No.03
Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
WP(C). No. 82 of 2025
Date of Decision: 23.04.2026
Shri. Karuna Kanta Rabha
S/o:- Late Jakson Rabha
R/o:- Village: Manikganj,
P.): Manikganj
District: - North Garo Hills,
Meghalaya.
…Petitioner
-Versus-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Meghalaya, Represented by the Commissioner and Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya, Education Department, Shillong.
2. The Director of School Education & Literacy, Meghalaya, Shillong.
3. The District School Education Officer, North-Garo Hills, Resubelpara.
4. The School Managing Committee of Manikganj Secondary School, Represented by its Secretary, PO – Manikganj, Dist. – North Garo Hills, Meghalaya, Pin : 783122.
5. Sanjay Kr. Rabha, Assistant Teacher of Manikganj Secondary School, PO – Manikganj, Dist. – North Garo Hills, Meghalaya, Pin : 783122.
…Respondents 2026:MLHC:389
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge
Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Ms. M.Rahman, Adv.
For the Respondent(s)
: Mrs. T. Yangi B. AAG with
Ms. Z.E.Nongkynrih, GA for R 1-3
Mr. S.Dey, Adv. for R 4 & 5.
i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc:
ii) Whether approved for publication
Yes/No
in press:
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
1. Ms. M.Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions prays that she may be allowed to withdraw this instant application, however, with liberty to file afresh, if so advised.
2. The same is not objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents.
3. Accordingly, matter stands closed and disposed of on withdrawal, however, with liberty as prayed.
Judge
2026:MLHC:389 Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2026.04.23 18:07:17 IST Signature Not Verified