Meghalaya High Court

MC(WPC)/130/2026 of ROHAN THAKUR Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. on 23 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No.03 Supp. List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG MC[WP(C)]. No. 130 of 2026 in WP(C). No. 9 of 2026 (disposed of ) Date of Decision: 23.04.2026 Shri. Rohan Thakur Aged about 23 years S/o. Kashi Nath Thakur, Madanriting Block-D, Shillong, Dist. East Khasi Hills, Meghalaya, Pin – 793021.

Serial No.03

Supp. List

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

MC[WP(C)]. No. 130 of 2026 in

WP(C). No. 9 of 2026 (disposed of)

Date of Decision: 23.04.2026

Shri. Rohan Thakur

Aged about 23 years

S/o. Kashi Nath Thakur,

Madanriting Block-D, Shillong,

Dist. East Khasi Hills, Meghalaya,

Pin – 793021.

…Applicant

-Versus-

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The Union of India, Represented by Secretary to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Employment, Public Grievance & Pension. Block S. 12, Central Office Campus, Ludhi Road, New Delhi-110003.

2. The Review Medical Examination Board of Recruitment Board Represented by its Presiding Officer, Composit Hospital, BSF, Shillong, Meghalaya Pin-793012.

3. The Staff Selection Commission (SSC),

Government of India, Ministry of Employment, Public Grievance & Pension, Represented by its Chairman, SSC Headquarters, New Delhi-110003.

4. The Government of India, represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi-110001.

5. The Director General, Central Armed Police Forces, New Delhi-110001.

6. The Detailed Medical Examination Board, Composit Hospital, BSF, Shillong, Meghalaya, Pin-793012.

... Opposite Parties

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge

Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. M.H.Choudhury, Adv.

For the Respondent(s)

: Dr. N.Mozika, DSGI with

Ms. M.Myrthong, Adv.

i) Whether approved for reporting in

Yes/No

Law journals etc:

ii) Whether approved for publication

Yes/No

in press:

JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

1. Heard Mr. M.H.Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. This is an application for recall of the order dated 08-04-2026, passed in WP(C). No. 9 of 2026, whereby the writ petition was dismissed for non- prosecution.

3. Perused the reasons set out in the application. The writ petitioner having made out sufficient cause for non-appearance, the matter stands restored to file.

4. Misc. case is allowed and disposed of.

Judge

2026:MLHC:393 Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2026.04.23 18:06:14 IST Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead