Meghalaya High Court
Crl.M.C./68/2026 of NENGGRIK D SANGMA Vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA on 23 April 2026
No. 01 Supplementary List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl.M.C. No. 68 of 2026 Date of Decision: 23.04.2026 Shri. Nenggrik D. Sangma, Son of Shri. W. Ch Sangma, Aged about 28 years (Convict presently serving sentence in Correctional Home & Prisons, Tura). Resident of Sandagre, P.S Tura,
Serial No. 01
Supplementary List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
Crl.M.C. No. 68 of 2026
Date of Decision: 23.04.2026
Shri. Nenggrik D. Sangma,
Son of Shri. W. Ch Sangma,
Aged about 28 years
(Convict presently serving sentence in
Correctional Home & Prisons, Tura).
Resident of Sandagre, P.S Tura,
District West Garo Hills,
Meghalaya.
…….. Applicant
- Vs-
State of Meghalaya through the
Commissioner & Secretary to the
Government of Meghalaya,
Department of Home (Police),
Civil Secretariat, Shillong.
……… Respondent
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge
Appearance:
For the Petitioner/Appellant(s)
:
Ms. P. Chettri, Legal Aid Counsel.
For the Respondent(s)
:
Mr. J. Thabah, GA.
i)
Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc.:
ii)
Whether approved for publication
in press:
Yes/No
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Ms. P. Chettri, learned Legal Aid Counsel for the applicant, who has submitted that the applicant has filed an appeal before this Court, being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the impugned judgment and related order of sentence dated 20.10.2022 passed by the Court of the learned Sessions Judge, West Garo Hills, Tura in Sessions Case No. 48 of 2018, wherein, he was directed to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 4(four) years with fine of ₹ 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) only, for the offence punishable under Section 368 IPC and to 7(seven) years simple imprisonment with fine of ₹ 50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand) only, for the offence punishable under Section 376(1) IPC, and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of 3(three) months.
2. However, while preferring an appeal, a delay of 1219 days has occurred, due to circumstances which is beyond the control of the applicant, being an illiterate person and hailing from a poor family, is not aware of his legal rights to file appeal or to engage a private counsel. As such, he could not prefer an appeal within the prescribed period of limitation. Thereafter, legal aid was sought for, and accordingly, this application was processed through Legal Aid
Counsel. It is therefore prayed that the delay be condoned and the appeal be admitted.
3. Mr. J. Thabah, learned GA appearing for the State respondent has no objection to the prayer for condonation of the delay.
4. On consideration of the submission made, this Court is inclined to allow this application on being satisfied that the grounds cited for the delay contain sufficient cause. Accordingly, the delay of 1219 days in preferring the appeal is hereby condoned.
5. Registry is directed to diarize the appeal and list it for admission after 1(one) week.
6. Misc. Case disposed of.
Judge
Digitally signed by DARIKORDOR NARY Date: 2026.04.23 17:43:26 IST Signature Not Verified