Meghalaya High Court
WP(C)/108/2026 of BIJU BASUMATARY Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. on 18 April 2026
Serial No. 17 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No. 108 of 2026 Date of Decision: 18.04.2026 Biju Basumatary, aged 44 years S/o Late Rajkumar Basumatary R/o Maidangguri, Udalguri Town, P.O. Udalguri District-Udalguri (Bodoland Territorial Region) Assam-784509 ….
Serial No. 17
Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
WP(C) No. 108 of 2026
Date of Decision: 18.04.2026
Biju Basumatary, aged 44 years
S/o Late Rajkumar Basumatary
R/o Maidangguri, Udalguri Town,
P.O. Udalguri District-Udalguri (Bodoland Territorial Region)
Assam-784509 …. Petitioner(s)
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The Union of India represented by The Union Home Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India, North Block, New Delhi-110001.
2. The Registrar General & Commissioner of Census, Office of the Registrar General India, Govt. of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Jangana Bhawan, 2/A Man Singh Road, New Delhi-110011.
3. The Secretary, Union Public Service Commotion, Dholpur House, Shah Jahan Road, New Delhi-110069.
4. The Director, Census Operations, Meghalaya, Ministry of Home Affairs, Zoram Villa Bomfyle Road, Shillong-793001, Meghalaya … Respondent(s)
2026:MLHC:364
__________________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner(s) : Ms. A. Pradhan, Adv.
For the Respondent(s) : Dr. N. Mozika, DSGI with
Ms. M. Myrchiang, Adv.
i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication
Yes/No
in press: (ORAL)
1. Ms. A. Pradhan, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that she may be allowed to withdraw the instant application.
2. Though this Court has reservations to the prayer in view of the fact that it was not clearly stated by the petitioner that he had already approached the Central Administrative Tribunal, before approaching this Court, however, in the interest of justice, this lapse is condoned and the prayer is allowed.
3. Accordingly, the matter stands closed and disposed of, on withdrawal. JUDGE Meghalaya 18.04.2026 “V. Lyndem-PS”
2026:MLHC:364 Digitally signed by VALENTINO LYNDEM Date: 2026.04.20 19:12:09 IST Signature Not Verified