Meghalaya High Court

Crl.Petn./69/2025 of CHANDI SAHA AND 4 ORS. Vs DIPA SAHA on 15 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl.Petn. No. 69 of 2025 Date of order: 15.04.2026 1. Shri Chandi Saha. 2. Smt Gita Rani Saha. 3. Smt Moni Saha@ Sutapa Saha. 4. Shri Sumit Saha@Durga Saha. 5. Smt Madhuri Saha. ...Petitioners - versus – Smt Dipa Saha ...Respondent Coram:

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

Crl.Petn. No. 69 of 2025

Date of order: 15.04.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Shri Chandi Saha.

2. Smt Gita Rani Saha.

3. Smt Moni Saha@ Sutapa Saha.

4. Shri Sumit Saha@Durga Saha.

5. Smt Madhuri Saha. ...Petitioners

- versus – Smt Dipa Saha ...Respondent

Coram:

Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice Appearance: For the Petitioners : Mr S.A. Sheikh, Adv. with

Mr L.N. Arengh, Adv.

For the Respondent : Mr H. Singh, Adv.

Mr S. Sengupta, Addl PP

i) Whether approved for No

reporting in Law journals etc.:

ii) Whether approved for publication No

in press:

JUDGMENT: (Oral)

In view of the preliminary objection raised by the learned counsel for the respondent i.e., that the petitioner ought to have filed a revision application instead of approaching this Court directly in writ jurisdiction, learned counsel for the petitioners Serial No. 02 Daily List 2026:MLHC:338

seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a revision application before the appropriate court.

2. The petition is, accordingly disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.

3. Needless to state, that if an application is filed seeking condonation of delay in filing the revision application, the time taken in this Court i.e., pendency of the criminal petition be taken into consideration, i.e., the petition was filed in October, 2025 challenging the summon dated 9th September, 2025.

4. Needless to also state, that this Court has not gone into the merits of the petition and as such, keeps all contentions of all parties on merits open.

5. The petition is, accordingly disposed of on the aforesaid terms.

(Revati Mohite Dere)

Chief Justice

2026:MLHC:338 Digitally signed by SYLVANA LIZ KHARBHIH Date: 2026.04.16 18:07:44 IST Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead