Meghalaya High Court
Crl.Petn./69/2025 of CHANDI SAHA AND 4 ORS. Vs DIPA SAHA on 15 April 2026
of 2 HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl.Petn. No. 69 of 2025 Date of order: 15.04.2026 1. Shri Chandi Saha. 2. Smt Gita Rani Saha. 3. Smt Moni Saha@ Sutapa Saha. 4. Shri Sumit Saha@Durga Saha. 5. Smt Madhuri Saha. ...Petitioners - versus – Smt Dipa Saha ...Respondent Coram:
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
Crl.Petn. No. 69 of 2025
Date of order: 15.04.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Shri Chandi Saha.
2. Smt Gita Rani Saha.
3. Smt Moni Saha@ Sutapa Saha.
4. Shri Sumit Saha@Durga Saha.
5. Smt Madhuri Saha. ...Petitioners
- versus – Smt Dipa Saha ...Respondent
Coram:
Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice Appearance: For the Petitioners : Mr S.A. Sheikh, Adv. with
Mr L.N. Arengh, Adv.
For the Respondent : Mr H. Singh, Adv.
Mr S. Sengupta, Addl PP
i) Whether approved for No
reporting in Law journals etc.:
ii) Whether approved for publication No
in press:
JUDGMENT: (Oral)
In view of the preliminary objection raised by the learned counsel for the respondent i.e., that the petitioner ought to have filed a revision application instead of approaching this Court directly in writ jurisdiction, learned counsel for the petitioners Serial No. 02 Daily List 2026:MLHC:338
seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a revision application before the appropriate court.
2. The petition is, accordingly disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
3. Needless to state, that if an application is filed seeking condonation of delay in filing the revision application, the time taken in this Court i.e., pendency of the criminal petition be taken into consideration, i.e., the petition was filed in October, 2025 challenging the summon dated 9th September, 2025.
4. Needless to also state, that this Court has not gone into the merits of the petition and as such, keeps all contentions of all parties on merits open.
5. The petition is, accordingly disposed of on the aforesaid terms.
(Revati Mohite Dere)
Chief Justice
2026:MLHC:338 Digitally signed by SYLVANA LIZ KHARBHIH Date: 2026.04.16 18:07:44 IST Signature Not Verified