Meghalaya High Court
WP(C)/155/2026 of M/S. BILLENNIUM CEMENTS LIMITED Vs CS SUDHA SARMA AND ORS. on 10 April 2026
No.12 Supp. List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C). No. 155 of 2026 Date of Decision: 10.04.2026 M/s. Billennium Cements Limited, Having its Registered Office at Damas, Mendipathar, North Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. Represented by Shri. Aditya Jain, Son of Shri. Ravi Jain, Resident of
Serial No.12
Supp. List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
WP(C). No. 155 of 2026
Date of Decision: 10.04.2026
M/s. Billennium Cements Limited,
Having its Registered Office at
Damas, Mendipathar, North Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. Represented by Shri. Aditya Jain, Son of Shri. Ravi Jain, Resident of Ferndale Complex, Block-III, Keating Road, Shillong, Meghalaya.
…Petitioner
-Versus-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. CS Sudha Sarma, Chairperson-Monitoring Committee M/s Virgo Cements Limited, IBBI/IPA-002/IP-No1251/2022-2023/14266, 185, MRD Road, (near State Bank of India) Bamunimaidan, Guwahati-781021.
2. CA Kannan Tiruvengadam, Resolution Professional M/s Virgo Cements Limited R/o. Netaji, Subhas Villa, 18, Karunamoyee Ghat Road (Tollygugne Area), Flat 3C, Kolkata, 700082, West Bengal, India.
3. M/s. Virgo Cements Limited,
Damas, North Garo Hills,
Mendipathar, Meghalaya – 793122.
…Respondents
2026:MLHC:323
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge
Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. S.Chanda, Adv.
For the Respondent(s)
: -
i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc:
ii) Whether approved for publication
Yes/No
in press:
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
1. Mr. S.Chanda, learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the instant writ application due to certain defects. However, he prays that he may be given liberty to file afresh, if so advised.
2. Prayer is allowed.
3. Accordingly, the instant matter stands closed and disposed of on withdrawal, however, with liberty as prayed.
Judge
2026:MLHC:323 Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2026.04.10 17:23:57 IST Signature Not Verified