Meghalaya High Court
Crl.M.C./50/2026 of MICHAEL MARAK Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ANR. on 7 April 2026
No. 02 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl.M.C. No. 50 of 2026 in Crl.A. No. 25 of 2026 Date of Decision: 07.04.2026 Shri. Michael Marak, Son of Shri. Chinam Sangma of Dakuri District, Dulbari, Barduah, Assam, Presently residing at Indiana Hotel, Police Bazar, Shillong, Meghalaya.
Serial No. 02
Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
Crl.M.C. No. 50 of 2026 in
Crl.A. No. 25 of 2026
Date of Decision: 07.04.2026
Shri. Michael Marak,
Son of Shri. Chinam Sangma of Dakuri District, Dulbari, Barduah, Assam, Presently residing at Indiana Hotel, Police Bazar, Shillong, Meghalaya.
…….. Applicant
- Vs-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Meghalaya through
Superintendent of Police,
East Khasi Hills District,
Meghalaya.
2. The Officer-in-Charge,
Rynjah Police Station, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya.
……… Respondents
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge
Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. K.C. Gautam, Adv. with
Ms. B. Syiem, Adv.
Mr. M. Halder, Adv.
For the Respondent(s)
: Mr. H. Kharmih, Addl. PP.
Mr. S. Sengupta, Addl. PP.
i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication in press:
Yes/No
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
1. Mr. K.C. Gautam, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that there is a subsisting order of suspension of sentence on the grant of bail on behalf of the applicant, such order being passed by the Trial Court on 09.03.2026 in Bail Application No. 57 (T) 2026 in Sessions Case No. 20 (T) 2014. It is however submitted that the said order will expire on 09.04.2026 for appearance of the applicant/convict before the appellate court.
2. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and the length of imprisonment which is 3(three) years, the learned counsel prays that the bail order granted by the Trial Court may be allowed to continue.
3. Mr. H. Kharmih, learned Addl. PP appearing for the State respondents has submitted that there is no objection to the prayer made.
4. This Court has considered the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant, and has observed that since the Trial Court records are not before this Court, the complete facts and circumstances of the case could not be appreciated.
5. Be that as it may, the prayer of the applicant is allowed, to the extent that interim bail is hereby granted till the receipt of the Trial Court’s order, and on receipt of the same, the applicant is to make a prayer for suspension of sentence and for grant of regular bail, if so desired, and the same to be considered on merits.
6. In view of the above, this Misc. Case is disposed of.
Judge
2026:MLHC:301 Digitally signed by DARIKORDOR NARY Date: 2026.04.07 18:44:20 IST Signature Not Verified