Meghalaya High Court

WP(C)/232/2023 of ETI BALA BARMAN Vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 4 ORS. on 2 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No. 12 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No. 232 of 2023 Date of Decision: 02.04.2026 Smti. Eti Bala Barman, W/o Shri. Ripon Kumar Modak, R/o Modakpara, PS & PO Mahendraganj, South West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. …….. Petitioner - Vs- 1. State of

Serial No. 12

Regular List

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

WP(C) No. 232 of 2023

Date of Decision: 02.04.2026

Smti. Eti Bala Barman,

W/o Shri. Ripon Kumar Modak,

R/o Modakpara, PS & PO Mahendraganj,

South West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.

…….. Petitioner

- Vs-

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. State of Meghalaya represented by

The Secretary, Education Department,

Govt. of Meghalaya, Shillong.

2. The Director of School Education &

Literacy, Meghalaya, Shillong.

3. The District School Education Officer,

South West Garo Hills District, Ampati.

4. The Sub-Divisional School Education

Officer, South West Garo Hills District, Ampati.

5. The School Managing Committee, Melapara

Non-Govt LP School, Mahendraganj, South

West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya,

represented by its President/Secretary.

……… Respondents

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge

Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. S. Deb, Adv.

For the Respondent(s)

: Mr. H. Abraham, GA. for R 1-4.

Mr. S.W. Sangma, Adv. vice

Mr. A.H. Hazarika, Adv. for R 5.

i) Whether approved for reporting in

Yes/No

Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication in press:

Yes/No

JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

1. Heard Mr. S. Deb, learned counsel for the petitioner, who has submitted that an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed before this Court with a prayer for impleadment of the applicant therein, who is said to be the present incumbent, who is occupying the post of the petitioner on her service being terminated.

2. It is the further submission of the learned counsel that the applicant has brought on record copies of resolution dated 05.07.2023, by which the appointment of the said applicant has been affected, and the service of the petitioner being terminated. The said resolution is not known to the petitioner, and the same was also not brought by the relevant respondents through their counter affidavits. Accordingly, it is prayed that this petition may be allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file afresh, so as to enable the petitioner to incorporate the new facts in a fresh petition.

3. Learned counsel for the respective respondents have no objection to the prayer made.

4. Accordingly, as prayed for, this petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn with liberty sought for allowed.

Judge

Digitally signed by DARIKORDOR NARY Date: 2026.04.02 18:17:57 IST Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead