Meghalaya High Court
Review Pet/3/2026 of PETER ALLAN THOROSE Vs DORBAR SHNONG OF CLEVE COLONY REPRESENTED BY THE HEADMAN on 2 April 2026
Serial No.01 Supple List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Review Petition No. 3 of 2026 Date of Order: 02.04.2026 ___________________________________________________________ Shri. Peter Allan Thorose, S/o (L) A . Alexander Thorose, R/o St. Peter's School, Cleve Colony, Shillong-793003, East
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Serial No.01 Supple List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG
Review Petition No. 3 of 2026
Date of Order: 02.04.2026 ___________________________________________________________ Shri. Peter Allan Thorose, S/o (L) A. Alexander Thorose, R/o St. Peter's School, Cleve Colony, Shillong-793003, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya.
…..Petitioner.
Vs.
Dorbar Shnong of Cleve Colony Represented by the Headman, Shri. Wadlihok Jones Nongrum S/o S. K. Jones, R/o Cleve Colony, Shillong-793003, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya.
…..Respondent.
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. D. Thabah, Adv.
For the Respondent(s)
: Mr. S. Thapa, Adv. Mr. S. Khyriem, Adv.
2026:MLHC:292
ORAL:-
Heard Mr. D. Thabah, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. S. Thapa, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
By this review petition, the petitioner has sought for review of order dated 20.03.2026 passed in CRP No. 4 of 2026. The prime contention raised in this review petition is that CRP No. 4 of 2026 was not maintainable in view of the availability of alternative remedy.
The ground raised in this review petition appears to be solely on the question of maintainability. This Court while passing the order dated 20.03.2026 had observed that the learned Trial Court while passing the impugned injunction order did not act in accordance with law and hence, the exercise of supervisory power of this Court was necessary.
In view of the above, the ground raised in this review petition has no merit, and the review petition, as such, is rejected.
Judge
Meghalaya 02.04.2026 “Abhinandan PS”
2026:MLHC:292 Digitally signed by ABHINANDAN KUMAR Date: 2026.04.02 17:39:56 IST Signature Not Verified