Meghalaya High Court

Crl.M.C./37/2026 of MD. ATWAR ALI Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. on 23 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl.M.C. No. 37 of 2026 Date of Decision: 23.03.2026 Md. Atwar Ali S/o (L) Abdul Rahman, R/o Dakinhatichula Village, P.O Barovidya, P.S. Chaigoan, District: Kamrup, Assam. Presently lodged in District Jail, Nongpoh. ………..

Serial No. 05

Regular List

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

Crl.M.C. No. 37 of 2026

Date of Decision: 23.03.2026

Md. Atwar Ali

S/o (L) Abdul Rahman,

R/o Dakinhatichula Village,

P.O Barovidya, P.S. Chaigoan,

District: Kamrup, Assam.

Presently lodged in District Jail, Nongpoh.

……….. Applicant/Petitioner

-Vs-

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The State of Meghalaya, represented by

The Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya, Home (Police), Shillong.

2. The Superintendent of Police,

Ri-Bhoi District, Nongpoh,

Meghalaya.

………… Opposite Parties

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge

Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. S. Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent(s)

: Mr. R. Gurung, GA.

Mr. H. Abraham, GA.

i) Whether approved for reporting in

Yes/No

Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication

in press:

Yes/No

Per W. Diengdoh, (J):

JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

1. Heard Mr. S. Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, who has submitted that the applicant has filed an appeal before this Court, being aggrieved by the impugned judgment dated 16.10.2025 and related order of sentence dated 17.10.2025 passed by the Court of the learned Sessions Judge, Ri-Bhoi District, Nongpoh in Sessions Case No. 156 of 2015 under Section 376(1) IPC.

2. However, while preferring an appeal, a delay of 90 days has occurred, due to circumstances which is beyond the control of the applicant, since he is an illiterate and poor person, as such, he could not prefer an appeal within the prescribed period of limitation. It is therefore prayed that the delay be condoned and the appeal be admitted.

3. Mr. R. Gurung, learned GA appearing for the State respondent has no objection to the prayer for condonation of the delay.

4. On consideration of the submission made, we find that there are good grounds for the appeal to be heard on merits. Accordingly, the delay of 90 days in preferring the appeal is hereby condoned.

5. Registry is directed to diarize the appeal and list it for admission on 01.04.2026.

6. Misc. Case disposed of.

(B. Bhattacharjee) (W. Diengdoh)

Judge Judge

2026:MLHC:260-DB Digitally signed by DARIKORDOR NARY Date: 2026.03.23 20:20:13 IST Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead