Meghalaya High Court

Crl.M.C./21/2026 of SAMBOR SAWKMIE Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA on 9 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No. 03 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl.M.C. No. 21 of 2026 Date of Decision: 09.03.2026 Shri. Sambor Sawkmie, Aged about 25 years, S/o (L) Kyier Khyllait, R/o Nongkyndong Umiapwar Village, PS: Umiam, Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya. Partly serving sentence in District Correctional

Serial No. 03

Regular List

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

Crl.M.C. No. 21 of 2026

Date of Decision: 09.03.2026

Shri. Sambor Sawkmie,

Aged about 25 years,

S/o (L) Kyier Khyllait,

R/o Nongkyndong Umiapwar Village,

PS: Umiam, Ri-Bhoi District,

Meghalaya.

Partly serving sentence in District

Correctional and Detention Centre,

Ri-Bhoi, Nongpoh.

……….. Applicant/Convict

-Vs-

The State of Meghalaya

Represented by Chief Secretary

Government of Meghalaya.

………… Respondent

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge

Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance:

For the Petitioner/Applicant(s)

:

Mr. S.P. Mahanta, LAC with

Ms. S. Chettri, Adv.

For the Respondent(s)

:

Mr. S. Sengupta, Addl. PP.

Mr. A.H. Kharwanlang, Addl. PP.

i)

Whether approved for reporting in

Yes/No

Law journals etc.:

ii)

Whether approved for publication

in press:

Yes/No

Per W. Diengdoh, (J):

JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Mr. S.P. Mahanta, learned Sr. counsel, who is also the Legal Aid Counsel in this matter, assisted by Ms. S. Chettri, learned counsel for the applicant, who has submitted that the applicant has preferred an appeal before this Court against the impugned judgment dated 12.08.2024 and related order of sentence dated 13.08.2024 passed by the Court of the learned Sessions Judge, Ri-Bhoi District, Nongpoh in Sessions Case No. 3 of 2022, wherein, he was directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 10 years with fine of ₹ 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) only for an offence punishable under Section 376(1) IPC.

2. However, while preferring an appeal, a delay of 503 days has occurred, the reason being that the applicant is an illiterate person, and has no means to engage a counsel. Thereafter, a Legal Aid Counsel was provided to him, and eventually, the appeal was prepared by the Legal Aid Counsel. It is therefore prayed that the delay be condoned and the appeal be admitted.

3. Mr. S. Sengupta, learned Addl. PP appearing for the State respondent has no objection to the admission of the appeal.

4. On consideration of the submission made, we find that there are good grounds for the appeal to be heard on merits. Accordingly, the delay of 503 days in preferring the appeal is hereby condoned.

5. Registry is directed to diarize the appeal and list it for admission on 16.03.2026.

6. Misc. Case disposed of.

(B. Bhattacharjee) (W. Diengdoh)

Judge Judge

2026:MLHC:159-DB Digitally signed by DARIKORDOR NARY Date: 2026.03.09 18:15:49 IST Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead