Meghalaya High Court

PIL/2/2026 of NIKSRANG CH MARAK Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. on 9 March 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

of 2 HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG PIL No. 2 of 2026 Date of order: 09.03.2026 Niksrang Ch Marak ...Petitioner - versus - 1. The State of Meghalaya, District Council Affairs Department, Government of Meghalaya represented by its Secretary, Meghalaya, Shillong. 2. The Garo Hills Autonomous

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

PIL No. 2 of 2026

Date of order: 09.03.2026

Niksrang Ch Marak

...Petitioner

- versus -

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The State of Meghalaya, District Council Affairs Department, Government of Meghalaya represented by its Secretary, Meghalaya, Shillong.

2. The Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, represented by its Secretary, Executive Committee, West Garo Hills, Tura.

3. The Chief Executive Member, Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, Tura, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.

4. The Deputy Chief Executive Member, Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, Tura, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.

5. The Secretary to the Govt. of Meghalaya, Law Department, Shillong, Meghalaya.

6. Deputy Commissioner (DC) of Tura, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.

7. Deputy Commissioner (DC) of Ampati, South West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.

8. Deputy Commissioner (DC) of Baghmara, South Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.

9. Deputy Commissioner (DC) of Williamnagar, East Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.

10. Deputy Commissioner (DC) of Resubelpara, North Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. Serial No. 03 Daily List 2026:MLHC:161-DB

11. Chief Election Commission, Govt. of Meghalaya, Shillong. ...Respondents

12. Election Commission of India, represented by its Secretary, New Delhi. ....Proforma Respondent

Coram:

Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner : Mr P.T. Sangma, Adv.

For the Respondents : Mr K. Khan, AAG with

Mr A.H. Kharwanlang, Addl Sr GA

Mr S. Dey, Adv. [for R2-4]

Learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions of the petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw the petition.

The petition is, accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.

We make it clear that we have not gone into the merits of the petition and as such, all contentions of all parties on merits are kept open.

(W. Diengdoh) (Revati Mohite Dere)

Judge Chief Justice

2026:MLHC:161-DB Digitally signed by SYLVANA LIZ KHARBHIH Date: 2026.03.09 17:55:24 IST Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead