Meghalaya High Court
Crl.Petn./46/2025 of LAKSHMI KAUR @ LAXMI KAUR Vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 3 ORS. on 6 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl.Petn.No.46/2025 Date of Order: 06.03.2026 Smti. Lakshmi Kaur @ Laxmi Kaur .... Petitioner Vs. 1. State of Meghalaya, through Public Prosecutor. 2. The Officer-in-Charge, Sardar Police Station, Shillong-793001. 3. SI M.K. Ray, Sardar Police Station,
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
Crl.Petn.No.46/2025
Date of Order: 06.03.2026
Smti. Lakshmi Kaur @ Laxmi Kaur .... Petitioner
Vs.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. State of Meghalaya, through Public Prosecutor.
2. The Officer-in-Charge, Sardar Police Station, Shillong-793001.
3. SI M.K. Ray, Sardar Police Station, Shillong-793001.
4. Smti. Jito Kaur. ..... Respondents
Coram:
Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice Appearance: For the Petitioner : Mrs. A. Synrem, Adv with
Mr. S. Thapa, Adv
Ms. D. Diengdoh, Adv
For the Respondents : Mr. K. Khan, AAG with
Mr. A.H. Kharwanlang, Addl.PP
JUDGMENT: (Oral)
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. By this petition, the petitioner essentially seeks quashing of the FIR registered vide FIR No.34(2) 2022 dated 8th February, 2022 with the Sardar Police Station.
Serial No.03 Daily List 2026:MLHC:146
3. Learned AAG on instructions of Mr. M.K. Rai, S.I. earlier attached with Sardar Police Station and now with Rynjah Police Station states that the Police have filed a closure report since they have found insufficient evidence against the petitioner during the course of investigation and that the same has been communicated to the complainant. The learned AAG has tendered a photo copy of the police report evidencing the same. The same is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification.
4. In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned AAG on instructions and the said photo copy of the closure report tendered today, nothing survives for further consideration in this petition.
5. The petition is accordingly disposed of.
(Revati Mohite Dere)
Chief Justice
Meghalaya 06.03.2026 “Lam DR-PS”
2026:MLHC:146 Digitally signed by LAMPHRANG KHARCHANDY Date: 2026.03.06 14:27:11 IST Signature Not Verified