Meghalaya High Court
Crl.M.C./14/2026 of PINGTON LAMARE Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ANR. on 23 February 2026
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl. MC No.14 of 2026 Date of order: 23.02.2026 Shri Pington Lamare S/o- (L) Anil Sankli Village- Umkaduh, P.S- Nongpoh Dist- Ribhoi, Meghalaya ….Appellant Vs 1. The State of Meghalaya Represented by learned Public Prosecutor. 2. Smti. Lusterbell Sylliang
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
Crl. MC No.14 of 2026 Date of order: 23.02.2026
Shri Pington Lamare
S/o- (L) Anil Sankli
Village- Umkaduh, P.S- Nongpoh
Dist- Ribhoi, Meghalaya
….Appellant
Vs
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Meghalaya Represented by learned Public Prosecutor.
2. Smti. Lusterbell Sylliang W/o- (L) Jomping Lamare Village- Umkaduh, P.S. Nongpoh Dist- Ribhoi, Meghalaya. …. Respondent
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge
i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication
in press:
Yes/No
For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Ms. A. Surana, Legal Aid Counsel.
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. R. Gurung, GA
Serial No. 02 Regular List
ORDER (ORAL) Per W. Diengdoh, (J):
Heard Ms. A. Surana, Legal Aid Counsel, who has submitted that the applicant/convicted under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 has preferred an appeal before this Court, being aggrieved with the judgment and order dated 27.09.2018 passed in Session Case No. 44 of 2015 by the learned Session Judge, Ri-Bhoi District, Nongpoh.
However, while preferring such appeal, a delay of 2640 days have occurred, the reason being that the appellant is an uneducated and illiterate person who is not aware of his right to file appeal, and also the fact that because of the alleged incident, the convict is also going through a traumatic experience for which he is suffering emotionally and otherwise. On the basis of these compounded factors, there have been a delay in the process of filing the related appeal.
It is prayed that the delay in filing the same may be condoned, since there are good grounds for the appeal to succeed, further submits the learned Legal Aid Counsel.
Mr. R. Gurung, learned GA has entered appearance on behalf of the State respondent, and has submitted that the State has no objection to the prayer made for condonation of the delay and the appeal to be heard on merits.
We have heard the learned counsel for the respective parties, though we are also concerned with the inordinate period of delay, nevertheless, for end of justice, we are inclined and persuaded by the reasons cited in this application.
Accordingly, the prayer made herein is allowed. The delay in filing the appeal is hereby condoned.
Registry is directed to register the appeal and list the same for admission on 25th February, 2026.
This Crl.MC. No. 14 of 2023 is disposed of.
(B. Bhattacharjee)
(W. Diengdoh) Judge Judge
Digitally signed by KHRAWDAPBOR BUHPHANG Date: 2026.02.23 17:44:55 IST Signature Not Verified