Meghalaya High Court
MC(CRP)/13/2025 of GRITI ARENGH Vs THE SHILLONG MUSLIM UNION on 11 February 2026
of 2 Serial No. 01 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG MC(CRP) No.13 of 2025 Date of Order: 11.02.2026 Smti. Griti Arengh W/o Shri R. Ahmed, R/o Lawsohtun Block III, Shillong, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. …..Petitioner -VERSUS- The Shillong Muslim Union, Eid-Gah,
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Serial No. 01 Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG
MC(CRP) No.13 of 2025
Date of Order: 11.02.2026
Smti. Griti Arengh W/o Shri R. Ahmed, R/o Lawsohtun Block III, Shillong, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya.
…..Petitioner
-VERSUS- The Shillong Muslim Union, Eid-Gah, Laban, Shillong East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. Represented by its General Secretary.
…..Respondent
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. S. Deb, Adv
For the Respondent(s)
: Mr. N. Khera, Adv with
Mr. R. Kharkrang, Adv
(ORAL)
Heard Mr. S. Deb, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also Mr. N. Khera, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
By this application the applicant has sought for condonation of delay of 84 days in preferring the civil revision application against the impugned order dated 13.02.2025 passed by the learned Assistant District Judge, Shillong, in Misc.Case No.80 (H) of 2023 arising out of TS (Eviction) No.7 (H) of 2017. 2026:MLHC:55
The reason for the delay is stated to be due to the financial constraint of the applicant and also that the certified copy of the impugned order was supplied to the applicant after a long delay.
The learned counsel for the respondent objected to the said explanation on the ground that the same is not supported by any evidence and that the statement appears to be non-specific as to the dates on which the present counsel was engaged by the applicant and when the revision petition was made ready.
Upon hearing the learned counsels appearing for the parties and upon perusal of the materials on record, it appears that, apart from the contention of the applicant that there was a financial constraint, the certified copy of the impugned order dated 13.02.2025 was supplied to the applicant only on 18.06.2025, though the same was applied for on 02.04.2025. It is, therefore, clear that the delay in preferring the connected revision application was also due to reasons beyond the control of the applicant. The reasons for the delay stated in the application are thus found to be satisfactory, and the prayer made in the application is allowed. The delay of 84 days in preferring the connected revision application against the impugned order dated 13.02.2025 is hereby condoned.
Registry to diarize the civil revision application and list it for motion.
Judge
Meghalaya 11.02.2026 “Shrity,PS” 2026:MLHC:55 Digitally signed by SHRITY CH MOMIN Date: 2026.02.11 12:17:47 IST Signature Not Verified