Meghalaya High Court
MC(Review Pet.)/10/2025 of TUNILA GABIL GANJET MARAK Vs THE GARO HILLS AUTONOMOUS DISTRICT COUNCIL AND 3 ORS. on 5 February 2026
Serial No. 02 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG MC (Review Pet.) No. 10 of 2025 Date of Decision: 05.02.2026 Smti Tunila Gabil Ganjet Marak, W/o Gonoth Manda Sangma, R/o Village Sasatgre, P.O. Rongram, Tura, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya … Applicant(s) Vs. 1. The Garo
Serial No. 02
Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
MC (Review Pet.) No. 10 of 2025
Date of Decision: 05.02.2026
Smti Tunila Gabil Ganjet Marak,
W/o Gonoth Manda Sangma,
West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya
… Applicant(s)
Vs.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, through The Chief Secretary Member, Tura West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya
2. The Executive Member, I/C Revenue, Garo Hills Autonomous District Council through The Chief Executive Member, Tura West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya
3. Shri Denithson R. Marak, H/o Smti Nengjak G. Momin,
West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya
4. Smti Nengjak G. Momin W/o Shri Denithson R. Marak
West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya
…. Respondent(s)
__________________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance: For the Applicant(s) : Mr. P.T. Sangma, Adv.
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S. Dey, Adv. (For R 1&2)
Mr. A.G Momin, Adv. (For R 3&4)
i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc:
ii) Whether approved for publication
Yes/No
in press: Per. H.S. Thangkhiew, Judge: (ORAL)
1. This Misc. application having been filed erroneously on assumption that law of Limitation is applicable in writ proceedings, is not necessary for consideration, and the same is disposed.
2. Registry to register and diarize the Review petition and the same be listed for admission, after 2(two) weeks.
3. The question of delay and laches will be left open.
(B. Bhattacharjee)
(H.S. Thangkhiew) Judge
Judge
Meghalaya 05.02.2026
“V. Lyndem PS”
2026:MLHC:41-DB Digitally signed by VALENTINO LYNDEM Date: 2026.02.05 20:13:50 IST Signature Not Verified