Meghalaya High Court

WA/80/2025 of BRANCH MANAGER, HDFC BANK LTD. Vs SIMA BHATTACHARJEE AND 4 ORS. on 29 January 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WA No.80/2025 with MC (WA) No.100/2025 Date of Order: 29.01.2026 Branch Manager, HDFC Bank Ltd., Police Bazar Branch, Police Bazar, Shillong-793001, Meghalaya ..... Appellant Vs. 1. Mrs. Sima Bhattacharjee 2. The State of Meghalaya, represented by the

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

WA No.80/2025 with

MC (WA) No.100/2025

Date of Order: 29.01.2026

Branch Manager, HDFC Bank Ltd., Police Bazar Branch, Police Bazar, Shillong-793001, Meghalaya ..... Appellant

Vs.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Mrs. Sima Bhattacharjee

2. The State of Meghalaya, represented by the Commissioner and Secretary, Home Police Department, Govt. of Meghalaya.

3. The Meghalaya Cyber Crime Branch, Shillong, represented by Deputy Superintendent, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya.

4. The Officer-in-Charge, Rynjah Police Station, Rynjah, Shillong, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya.

5. National Payment Corporation of India, 1001A, B Wing, 10th Floor, The Capital, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai-400050

..... Respondents

Coram:

Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge Appearance: For the Appellant : Mr. S. Marpan, Adv

For the Respondents : Mr. K. Paul, Sr.Adv with

Mr. S. Chanda, Adv for R/1

Mr. N. Syngkon, GA with

Mr. J.N. Rynjah, GA for R/2-4

JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble, the Chief Justice) (Oral)

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1.

Serial No.01 Daily List

2. By this appeal, the appellant has impugned the order dated 10th December, 2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition (Civil) No.319 of 2024.

3. Admittedly, the said petition is pending and the order impugned is an interim order by which the appellant has been directed to remit an amount of ₹99,000/- within seven days from the date of the order into the account of the respondent No.1 (original petitioner).

4. Without going into the merits of the impugned order, learned counsel for the appellant states that he will remit the said amount into the respondent No.1’s account before 15th February, 2026, without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the learned Single Judge in the pending writ petition.

5. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 also states that the said amount will be accepted without prejudice to his rights and contentions in the writ petition pending before the learned Single Judge. He states that the amount of ₹99,000/- will not be utilised till the aforesaid writ petition is disposed of.

6. With the aforesaid order, the appeal and the miscellaneous application stand disposed of.

7. We make it clear that we have not gone into the merits of the impugned order and, as such, all contentions of the parties are kept open.

(W. Diengdoh) (Revati Mohite Dere) Judge Chief Justice

Meghalaya 29.01.2026 “Lam DR-PS” 2026:MLHC:14-DB Digitally signed by LAMPHRANG KHARCHANDY Date: 2026.01.29 15:15:02 IST Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead