Meghalaya High Court
MC(WA)/92/2025 of STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 5 ORS. Vs RANGEHBOK LYNGWA on 11 December 2025
of 2 HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG MC(WA) No. 92 of 2025 Date of order: 11.12.2025 1. The State of Meghalaya, represented by the Commissioner/Secretary to the Govt. of Meghalaya, Education Department, Shillong. 2. The Principal Secretary to the to the Govt. of Meghalaya, Education
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
MC(WA) No. 92 of 2025
Date of order: 11.12.2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Meghalaya, represented by the Commissioner/Secretary to the Govt. of Meghalaya, Education Department, Shillong.
2. The Principal Secretary to the to the Govt. of Meghalaya, Education Department, Shillong.
3. The Under Secretary to the Govt. of Meghalaya, Education Department, Shillong.
4. The Director of Higher and Technical Education, to the Govt. of Meghalaya, Shillong.
5. The Joint Secretary to the Govt. of Meghalaya, Education Department, Shillong.
6. The Personnel & AR (Department), Shillong, Meghalaya. ….Applicants
- vs - Rangehbok Lyngwa ….Respondent
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Soumen Sen, Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge Appearance: For the Applicants : Mr A.H. Kharwanlang, Addl Sr GA with
Ms S. Laloo, GA
For the Respondents : Mr S. Sen, Adv.
i) Whether approved for
Yes/No
reporting in Law journals etc.:
ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No
in press:
Serial No. 1 Daily List 2025:MLHC:1211-DB
ORDER: (per the Hon’ble, the Chief Justice) (Oral)
Affidavit of service is taken on record.
There is a delay of 36 days in preferring the appeal.
We are satisfied with the explanation offered in the said application for not being able to file the appeal within the statutory period. Since no affidavit has been called for, all allegations are deemed to have been denied.
Accordingly, the application [MC(WA) No. 92 of 2025] for condonation of delay in preferring the appeal is allowed.
(W. Diengdoh) (Soumen Sen)
Judge Chief Justice
2025:MLHC:1211-DB Digitally signed by SYLVANA LIZ KHARBHIH Date: 2025.12.11 18:13:53 IST Signature Not Verified