Meghalaya High Court

WP(C)/481/2022 of LAINISH T. SANGMA Vs THE GARO HILLS AUTONOMOUS DISTRICT COUNCIL AND 7 ORS. on 5 December 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No. 05 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No. 481 of 2022 Date of Decision: 05.12.2025 Smti. Lainish T. Sangma W/o (L) Sipinder Arengh, R/o Daribokgiri P.O Rongsak P.S. Rongsak, East Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. …….. Petitioner - Vs- 1. The Garo Hills

Serial No. 05

Regular List

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

WP(C) No. 481 of 2022

Date of Decision: 05.12.2025

Smti. Lainish T. Sangma

W/o (L) Sipinder Arengh,

R/o Daribokgiri

P.O Rongsak

P.S. Rongsak, East Garo Hills District,

Meghalaya.

…….. Petitioner

- Vs-

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, Represented by its Secretary, Executive Committee, West Garo Hills, Tura.

2. The Chief Executive Member, Garo Hills, Autonomous District Council, Tura.

3. Executive Member, I/C Revenue & Land, Garo Hills, Autonomous District Council, Tura.

4. Shri. Chelting M. Sangma,

R/o Mandalgiri,

P.O & P.S Rongsak,

East Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.

5. Shri. Preditson M. Sangma,

R/o Mandalgiri,

P.O & P.S Rongsak,

East Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.

6. Shri. Ballen Ch. Marak,

R/o Mandalgiri,

P.O & P.S Rongsak,

East Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.

7. Smti. Nokot M. Sangma,

R/o Mandalgiri,

P.O & P.S Rongsak,

East Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.

8. Shri. John Illipson S. Marak,

R/o Mandalgiri,

P.O & P.S Rongsak,

East Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.

……… Respondents

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge

Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. P.T. Sangma, Adv.

For the Respondent(s)

: Mr. D. Wahlang, Adv. vice

Mr. S. Dey, SC, GHADC/R 1-3.

Mr. S. Chanda, Adv.

Mr. B. Snaitang, Adv. vice

Mr. K. Paul, Sr. Adv. for R 4-8.

i) Whether approved for reporting in

Yes/No

Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication in press:

Yes/No

JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

1. Mr. P.T. Sangma, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that, he is instructed to submit before this Court that the petitioner wishes to withdraw this petition with liberty to proceed with any alternative remedy applicable.

2. Mr. S. Chanda, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos. 4-8 has not objected to the prayer made for withdrawal of this petition, but has however objected to the prayer for liberty sought for.

3. Mr. D. Wahlang, learned counsel vice Mr. S. Dey, learned Standing Counsel appears on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1-3/GHADC.

4. On prayer made, this petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. However, as far as the liberty sought for, this Court, would hold that the petitioner, if so permissible by law, has the liberty to approach any forum to agitate any matter, if so aggrieved, and for that, no specific liberty is required to be given. However, it is reiterated that the petitioner would not be barred to approach any forum or even this Court, if so desired.

5. Petition disposed of.

Judge

Digitally signed by DARIKORDOR NARY Date: 2025.12.05 17:54:52 IST Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead