Meghalaya High Court
MC(WPC)/289/2025 of ACHHE LAL DHOBI Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS. on 17 November 2025
of 2 Serial No. 07 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG MC(WPC) No.289 of 2025 Date of Order: 17.11.2025 Sri. Acche Lal Dhobi, Aged about 67 years Son of Sri Jag Narayan, Resident of Village-Sher, P.O.-Sher, Tehsil-Ballia, District-Ballia, Uttar Pradesh PIN-277203 …..Applicant
Serial No. 07
Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
MC(WPC) No.289 of 2025
Date of Order: 17.11.2025
Sri. Acche Lal Dhobi, Aged about 67 years Son of Sri Jag Narayan, Resident of Village-Sher, P.O.-Sher, Tehsil-Ballia, District-Ballia, Uttar Pradesh PIN-277203
…..Applicant
-VERSUS-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The Union of India represented by its Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs New Delhi-110001
2. The Director General of Assam Rifles, Shillong, Meghalaya-11.
3. The Commander, 9 Sector, Assam Rifles, C/o 99 APO
4. The commandant, 30th Assam Rifles, C/o 99 APO, PIN-932030.
…..Opposite Parties
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. V. Kumar, Adv with
Ms. P. Chettri, Adv
For the Respondent(s)
: Dr. N. Mozika, DSGI with
Ms. N.A.U. Sogra, Adv
(ORAL)
Heard learned counsels appearing for the parties. 2025:MLHC:1096
This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 seeking condonation of delay of 187 days in filing the application for restoration of WP(C) No.132/2019 which was dismissed for default on 08.04.2025.
It is not the case of the parties that provision of Limitation Act is applicable in the writ petition and hence, there is no requirement of filing any separate application seeking condonation of delay in preferring the restoration application.
The application, as such, requires no consideration and stands dismissed. However, despite dismissal of the condonation application, registry is directed to diarize the restoration application filed by the applicant and list the same for consideration.
With the above, this application stands disposed of.
Judge
Meghalaya 17.11.2025 “Shrity,PS” 2025:MLHC:1096 Digitally signed by SHRITY CH MOMIN Date: 2025.11.17 16:35:56 IST Signature Not Verified