Meghalaya High Court
Crl.M.C./137/2025 of STEVENSON NONGSIEJ Vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 2 ORS. on 17 November 2025
No. 04 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl.M.C. No. 137 of 2025 Date of Decision: 17.11.2025 Shri. Stevenson Nongsiej, Aged about 30 years, S/o Shri. Lotar Nongrum, R/o Lumshaid, Mawprem, East Khasi Hills District, Shillong. …….. Applicant - Vs- 1. State of
Serial No. 04
Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
Crl.M.C. No. 137 of 2025
Date of Decision: 17.11.2025
Shri. Stevenson Nongsiej,
Aged about 30 years,
S/o Shri. Lotar Nongrum,
R/o Lumshaid, Mawprem,
East Khasi Hills District, Shillong.
…….. Applicant
- Vs-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. State of Meghalaya, Represented by the
Commissioner Secretary (Home),
Government of Meghalaya, Shillong.
2. Officer Incharge, Rynjah Police Station, Shillong, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya.
3. Investigating Officer, Rynjah Police Station, Shillong, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya.
……… Respondents
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge
Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Ms. A. Kharshiing, Adv.
For the Respondent(s)
: Mr. H. Kharmih, Addl. PP.
Mr. S. Sengupta, Addl. PP.
i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication in press:
Yes/No
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
1. Ms. A. Kharshiing, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has preferred an appeal against the impugned judgment and order dated 28.07.2025 passed by the Court of the learned Special Judge (POCSO), East Khasi Hills Distirct, Shillong in Special (POCSO) Case No. 26 of 2015.
2. However, while preferring the said appeal, a delay of 48 days has occurred on the ground that the applicant could not prepare the same within time due to financial constraints and other reasons.
3. Mr. H. Kharmih, learned Addl. PP appearing on behalf of the State respondents has no objection to the prayer made.
4. Accordingly, on consideration of the submission made by the learned counsels, this Court is also inclined to allow this application. The delay of 48 days in filing the related appeal is hereby condoned.
5. Misc. Case disposed of.
6. Registry to diarize the appeal and list it for admission after 1(one) week. Judge
2025:MLHC:1100 Digitally signed by DARIKORDOR NARY Date: 2025.11.17 20:00:35 IST Signature Not Verified