Meghalaya High Court

CRP/25/2025 of ADALIN LYNGDOH NONGLAIT Vs THE HEADMAN (SORDAR) OF MAWLANGREN VILLAGE AND ANR. on 14 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 Serial No. 05 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG CRP No.25 of 2025 Date of Order: 14.11.2025 Smti. Adalin Lyngdoh Nonglait alias Aidalin Lyngdoh Nonglait Daughter of (Late) Idian Lyngdoh Nonglait, Resident of Mawrusyiar Village, West Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya.

Serial No. 05

Regular List

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

CRP No.25 of 2025

Date of Order: 14.11.2025

Smti. Adalin Lyngdoh Nonglait alias

Aidalin Lyngdoh Nonglait

Daughter of (Late) Idian Lyngdoh Nonglait, Resident of Mawrusyiar Village, West Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya.

…..Petitioner

-VERSUS-

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The Headman (Sordar) of Mawlangren Village, Eastern West Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya.

2. The Syiem of Hima Nongkhlaw, West Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya

…..Respondents

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. S. Marpan, Adv

For the Respondent(s)

: Mr. A.R. Passah, Adv (R:1)

Ms. T. Sutnga, Adv (R:2)

(ORAL)

Heard learned counsels appearing for the parties By this revision petition, the petitioner has challenged the legality and correctness of the impugned order dated 14.10.2025 passed in MCA No.26 of 2025 by the Court of the learned Additional Judge, District Council Court, Shillong.

The prime contention raised in the revision petition is that the 2025:MLHC:1092

learned Court below passed the impugned order mechanically without applying its mind and also without recording any reason for passing such order.

The learned counsels appearing for the respondents, in their usual frankness submit that the matter can be sent back to the Court of the learned Additional Judge for fresh consideration after hearing both the parties.

In view of the submission made by the parties, this revision petition is disposed of by setting aside the impugned order dated 14.10.2025. The matter is remitted back to the Court of the learned Additional Judge, District Council Court, Shillong for consideration of the interim prayer in MCA No.26 of 2025 afresh after affording opportunity to the rival parties. As the matter pertains to land dispute, the learned Court shall make an endeavour to hear and dispose of the prayer made for interim relief at the earliest.

With the above, this revision petition stands disposed of.

Judge

Meghalaya 14.11.2025 “Shrity,PS” 2025:MLHC:1092 Digitally signed by SHRITY CH MOMIN Date: 2025.11.18 15:06:37 IST Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead