Meghalaya High Court
Review Pet/21/2025 of RANJENG G. SANGMA Vs THE GARO HILLS AUTONOMOUS DISTRICT COUNCIL AND 6 ORS. on 11 November 2025
No.04 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Review Pet. No. 21 of 2025 Date of Decision: 11.11.2025 Shri. Ranjeng G. Sangma, S/o. Lt. Ronjen Marak. …Petitioner -Versus- 1. The Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, Represented by the Secretary, Tura. 2. The Chief Executive
Serial No.04
Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
Review Pet. No. 21 of 2025
Date of Decision: 11.11.2025
Shri. Ranjeng G. Sangma,
S/o. Lt. Ronjen Marak.
…Petitioner
-Versus-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, Represented by the Secretary, Tura.
2. The Chief Executive Member, Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, Tura.
3. The Executive Member, In-charge Revenue etc, Garo Hills Autonomous District Council.
4. Shri. Natje Ch. Marak, Nokma Jelbongpara Akhing, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.
5. Smti. Santira Ch. Marak, Nokma of Jelbongpara Akhing, W/o. Shri. Donald Ch. Sangma, R/o. Jelbongpara, P.S.Ampati, District South West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.
6. Shri. Donald Ch. Sangma, H/o. Santira Ch. Marak, R/o. Jelbongpara, P.S.Ampati, District South West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.
7. Shri. Emarson Ch. Marak, S/o. Lt. Dingka Ch. Sangma, R/o Jelbongpara, P.S.Ampati, District South West Garo Hills, Meghalaya.
…Respondents
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge
Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. P.T.Sangma, Adv.
For the Respondent(s)
: Mr. S.Dey, SC for R 1-3.
Mr. S.A.Shiekh, Adv. for R 4.
Mr. Philemon Nongbri, Adv. for R 5-7.
i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc:
ii) Whether approved for publication
Yes/No
in press:
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
1. On the delay of 341 days being condoned, this review petition is taken up for consideration.
2. In view of the order dated 11-11-2025, passed in MC (Review. Pet). No. 5 of 2025, wherein observations had been made with regard to the existence of the document dated 20-11-1926, this review application deserves no consideration and the same is dismissed.
Judge
2025:MLHC:1075 Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2025.11.11 05:24:01 IST Signature Not Verified