Meghalaya High Court

Crl.M.C./132/2025 of SKHEM SYRTI Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA on 3 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No. 03 Daily List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl. M.C. No. 132 of 2025 Date: 03.11.2025 Shri. Skhem Syrti, Son of (L) C. Bareh, Resident of Jalaphet Village, East Jaintia Hills District, Meghalaya, Presently at Jowai District Prison and Correctional Home, Jowai. …..Appellant

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Serial No. 03 Daily List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl. M.C. No. 132 of 2025

Date: 03.11.2025 Shri. Skhem Syrti, Son of (L) C. Bareh, Resident of Jalaphet Village, East Jaintia Hills District, Meghalaya, Presently at Jowai District Prison and Correctional Home, Jowai.

…..Appellant

-Versus-

The State f Meghalaya through the Secretary Home (Police) Department, Shillong, Meghalaya.

…..Respondent

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge

Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. R. Kharkrang, Adv For the Respondent(s)

: Mr. S. Sengupta, Addl. Sr. GA

i) Whether approved for reporting in

Yes/No

Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication in press:

Yes/No

2025:MLHC:1044

JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

Heard Mr. R. Kharkrang, learned counsel for the applicant who has submitted that the applicant contemplates to file an appeal against the judgment and sentence dated 27th August, 2025 passed in Special (POCSO) Case No. 62 of 2020 by the learned Special Judge (POCSO), East Jaintia Hills.

However, while preferring the said appeal, a delay of 4 (four) days has occurred, for which this application is preferred seeking condonation, the delay is caused due to the fact that the appellant could not communicate with his counsel in time.

Mr. S. Sengupta, learned Addl. PP has accepted notice on behalf of the State respondent, he also has no objection to the prayer made. Accordingly, this Court, being convinced that good grounds has been made shown in this application, the delay for 4 (four) days in preferring the related appeal is hereby condoned. Registry is directed to diarize the appeal and list the same for admission after 1 (one) week.

Misc. Case is disposed of.

(W. Diengdoh)

Judge

Meghalaya 03.11.2025 “Khraw” 2025:MLHC:1044 Digitally signed by KHRAWDAPBOR BUHPHANG Date: 2025.11.03 19:31:23 IST Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead