Meghalaya High Court
WP(C)/370/2025 of APU DEY Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS. on 23 October 2025
No.17 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C). No. 370 of 2025 Date of Decision: 23.10.2025 Shri. Apu Dey, S/o. (L) Nityananda Dey. …Petitioner -Versus- 1. The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, New Delhi – 110001. 2. The
Serial No.17
Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
WP(C). No. 370 of 2025
Date of Decision: 23.10.2025
Shri. Apu Dey,
S/o. (L) Nityananda Dey.
…Petitioner
-Versus-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, New Delhi – 110001.
2. The Regional Director, The Registrar of Companies, North Eastern Region, Guwahati, Assam.
3. The Registrar, Registrar of Companies, North Eastern Region, Guwahati, Assam.
…Respondents
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge
Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. B.Deb, Adv.
For the Respondent(s)
: Mr. R.Debnath, CGC.
i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc:
ii) Whether approved for publication
Yes/No
in press:
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
1. The writ petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for release of pending fees for conducting cases on behalf of the respondent, which is the Registrar of Companies.
2. In the course of the proceedings, the admissible payments payable to the writ petitioner has since been processed and certain amounts i.e. ₹1,54,680/- has already be paid.
3. Mr. R.Debnath, learned CGC appearing for the respondents, has produced a communication dated 22-10-2025, before this Court which shows that 08 Nos. of bills submitted by the writ petitioner have been processed and forwarded for payment subject to availability of funds as per the budget. He submits that as the Department is seized with the matter, the writ petition may be closed as the due amounts of the writ petitioner will be released in due course of time.
4. Mr. B.Deb, learned counsel for the petitioner acknowledges the receipt of ₹1,54,680/-, but submits that the other amounts are yet to be received.
5. On hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the communication dated 22-10-2025, it is noted that the grievance of the writ petitioner has received due consideration by the respondents and the payments as due are being processed. In this view of the matter, the instant writ petition is closed with a direction to the respondents that the dues as admissible be cleared as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of this order.
6. With the above direction, matter accordingly stands disposed of.
Judge
Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2025.10.23 04:16:28 IST Signature Not Verified