Meghalaya High Court

Crl.Petn./55/2025 of FORYOUNICA M. KHARMIH Vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 2 ORS. on 16 October 2025

Cites 1, Cited by 0

of 2 Serial No. 12 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl.Petn. No.55 of 2025 Date of Order: 16.10.2025 Smti. Foryounica M. Kharmih D/o (L) K. Kharshiing, R/o 3rd Mile, Lumpdeng, Upper Shillong, East Khasi Hills, Meghalaya. … Petitioner -VERSUS- 1. State of Meghalaya

Serial No. 12

Regular List

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

Crl.Petn. No.55 of 2025

Date of Order: 16.10.2025

Smti. Foryounica M. Kharmih

D/o (L) K. Kharshiing,

R/o 3rd Mile, Lumpdeng, Upper Shillong,

East Khasi Hills, Meghalaya.

… Petitioner

-VERSUS-

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. State of Meghalaya represented by the Secretary Home (Police) Department, Government of Meghalaya.

2. Officer-in-Charge, Lumdiengjri Police Stattion, East Khasi Hills, Shillong.

3. Smti. Wermon Marbaniang, D/o (L) S. Nongbet, R/o 5th Mile, Upper Shillong, East Khasi Hills, Meghalaya.

… Respondents

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Ms. N.M. Kharshemlang, Adv

For the Respondent(s)

: Ms. S. Kh. Nongrum GA (R:1-2)

Mr. M.R. Marak, Adv (R:3)

(ORAL)

Heard learned counsels appearing for the parties.

The petitioner has approached this Court for quashing of the FIR dated 11.06.2025 in Lumdiengjri P.S. Case No.73 of 2025 on the basis of a compromise deed dated 01.08.2025 entered into between the petitioner 2025:MLHC:980

and the private respondent No.3. The learned counsels appearing for the respondents have no objection to the prayer made in the petition. However, it appears that the offence involved in the matter is under section 303(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, which is a compoundable offence.

Since, the offence alleged is compoundable, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach the appropriate Court.

In view of the above, this petition stands dismissed on withdrawal with liberty as prayed for.

Judge

Meghalaya 16.10.2025 “Shrity,PS” 2025:MLHC:980 Digitally signed by SHRITY CH MOMIN Date: 2025.10.16 15:37:06 IST Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead