Meghalaya High Court

Crl.M.C./92/2024 of YOWAN O. LAMARE Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ANR. on 8 October 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No. 13 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl.M.C. No. 92 of 2024 in Crl.A. No. 42 of 2024 Date of Decision: 08.10.2025 Shri. Yowan O. Lamare Son of Smti. Model Lamare Resident of Lumshnong Village, East Jaintia Hills District, Meghalaya, presently lodged at District Jail, Jowai.

Serial No. 13

Regular List

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

Crl.M.C. No. 92 of 2024 in

Crl.A. No. 42 of 2024

Date of Decision: 08.10.2025

Shri. Yowan O. Lamare

Son of Smti. Model Lamare

Resident of Lumshnong Village,

East Jaintia Hills District,

Meghalaya, presently lodged at District

Jail, Jowai.

……… Applicant

-Vs-

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The State of Meghalaya

Through the Superintendent of Police,

East Jaintia Hills District, Meghalaya.

2. Officer-in-Charge,

Women Khliehriat Police Station,

East Jaintia Hills District, Meghalaya. .…….. Respondents

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge

Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Ms. R. Kharshiing, Adv.

Mr. A. Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent(s)

: Mrs. T. Yangi. B, AAG with

Mr. J.N. Rynjah, GA.

Mr. A.H. Kharwanlang, Addl. PP.

i) Whether approved for reporting in

Yes/No

Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication

in press:

Yes/No

JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

Per W. Diengdoh, J:

1. Heard Ms. R. Kharshiing, learned counsel for the applicant, who has submitted that the applicant is suffering from ailments affecting his kidney and other organs of his body, for which he requires urgent and immediate treatment. It is admitted though, that the prison authorities have referred the case of the applicant for treatment at NEIGRIHMS, Shillong, however, he could not be treated at the said hospital on the ground that there are no hospital beds available at the relevant point of time.

2. It is also the submission of the learned counsel that the relatives of the applicant desires that he may be allowed to be treated at a private medical hospital, most probably Bethany Hospital, Shillong. In view thereof, prayer is made that the sentence may be suspended, and bail be granted to the applicant, to enable the relatives to admit him in the said hospital for the said treatment.

3. Mr. J.N. Rynjah, learned GA appearing on behalf of the State respondent has submitted that, pursuant to this Court’s order, the medical status report dated 06.10.2025 issued by the Sr. Medical & Health Officer, District Prison & Correctional Home, Jowai has been produced before this Court today. He also submits that according to the medical status report, though, the applicant is advised for surgical intervention at NEIGRIHMS, it is a fact that there is unavailability of hospital beds at that time, and he was instructed to report back to the hospital once a bed becomes available.

4. We have considered the submission made by the learned counsel for the respective parties and have also perused the said medical status report. It is our opinion that the said report is vague, and has not been able to give a detailed account of the nature and severity of the ailment suffered by the applicant, the ground of non-availability of hospital beds at NEIGRIHMS, according to our opinion, is also unfounded. However, from whatever has been stated in the said medical report, particularly the opinion about the requirement of surgical intervention as far as the applicant is concerned, at this point of time, we are in agreement that the applicant be allowed to seek medical attention from any medical facility he desires, more particularly from Bethany Hospital, Shillong or any other medical hospital within Shillong.

5. In view of the above, we accordingly suspend the sentence of the applicant in the interim for a period of 1(one) month, and interim bail is also granted in this regard for the said specific purpose and period. The period will run from today’s date. At the end of the 1(one) months’ period, the applicant is directed to report back to the prison authorities.

6. The bail conditions are as follows:

i) That he shall not abscond;

ii) That he shall produce a personal bond of ₹ 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial Service) of the Court;

iii) That he shall also give details of his residential address and contact number to the prison authorities in case he is required to be contacted once he starts his treatment, and to inform the prison authorities accordingly.

7. In view of the above, this Misc. Case is disposed of accordingly.

(B. Bhattacharjee) (W. Diengdoh)

Judge Judge

Digitally signed by DARIKORDOR NARY Date: 2025.10.08 18:22:53 IST Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead