Meghalaya High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/3/2025 of LEWIS SOOTING Vs S.R. LYNGDOH AND 3 ORS. on 23 April 2025
No. 09 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Cont.Cas(C) No. 3 of 2025 Date of Decision: 23.04.2025 Shri. Lewis Sooting H/o Smti. Mariza Janong Sooting :::Petitioner -Vs- 1.Shri. S.R. Lyngdoh representing Respondents No. 2 and 3. 2.Smti. Jhadsina Rita Janong D/o (L) Kular Thabah R/o
Serial No. 09
Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
Cont.Cas(C) No. 3 of 2025
Date of Decision: 23.04.2025
Shri. Lewis Sooting
H/o Smti. Mariza Janong Sooting
:::Petitioner
-Vs-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Shri. S.R. Lyngdoh representing Respondents No. 2 and 3.
2. Smti. Jhadsina Rita Janong D/o (L) Kular Thabah R/o Centre Nongrim Hills, Shillong, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya
3. Shri. John Janong S/o Smti. Jhadsina Janong R/o Centre Nongrim Hills, Shillong East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya
4. Smti. Lily Nongkhlaw Officer-in-charge, Laitumkhrah Police Station, Shillong East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya
:::Respondents
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance:
For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. S. Jindal, Legal Aid Counsel
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. K.Ch. Gautam, Adv.(For R 1)
Mr. K.V.E.Kharnongbak, Adv. (For R 2&3)
Mr. E.R. Chyne, GA (For R 4).
i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication in press:
Yes/No Oral:
1. This matter has been brought before this Court, it appears on a misconception of the petitioner with regard to certain acts, which he perceived as contemptuous.
2. Today, Mr. S. Jindal, learned counsel who is present as Legal Aid Counsel on behalf of the petitioner submits that the matter may be disposed of at this stage itself by closing the contempt proceedings.
3. Though, Mr. K.Ch. Gautam, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. K.V.E. Kharnongbak, learned counsel appearing for the respondents No. 2 and 3 have voiced their objections, this Court at this stage, hereby disposes of the Contempt Application by closing the same, without any further orders.
4. Matter accordingly stands closed and disposed of.
Judge Meghalaya 23.04.2025 “D.Thabah-PS”
2025:MLHC:313 Digitally signed by DARIHUN THABAH Date: 2025.04.23 06:17:47 IST Signature Not Verified