Meghalaya High Court

Cont.Cas(C)/3/2025 of LEWIS SOOTING Vs S.R. LYNGDOH AND 3 ORS. on 23 April 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No. 09 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Cont.Cas(C) No. 3 of 2025 Date of Decision: 23.04.2025 Shri. Lewis Sooting H/o Smti. Mariza Janong Sooting :::Petitioner -Vs- 1.Shri. S.R. Lyngdoh representing Respondents No. 2 and 3. 2.Smti. Jhadsina Rita Janong D/o (L) Kular Thabah R/o

Serial No. 09

Regular List

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

Cont.Cas(C) No. 3 of 2025

Date of Decision: 23.04.2025

Shri. Lewis Sooting

H/o Smti. Mariza Janong Sooting

:::Petitioner

-Vs-

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Shri. S.R. Lyngdoh representing Respondents No. 2 and 3.

2. Smti. Jhadsina Rita Janong D/o (L) Kular Thabah R/o Centre Nongrim Hills, Shillong, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya

3. Shri. John Janong S/o Smti. Jhadsina Janong R/o Centre Nongrim Hills, Shillong East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya

4. Smti. Lily Nongkhlaw Officer-in-charge, Laitumkhrah Police Station, Shillong East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya

:::Respondents

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance:

For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. S. Jindal, Legal Aid Counsel

For the Respondent(s) : Mr. K.Ch. Gautam, Adv.(For R 1)

Mr. K.V.E.Kharnongbak, Adv. (For R 2&3)

Mr. E.R. Chyne, GA (For R 4).

i) Whether approved for reporting in

Yes/No

Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication in press:

Yes/No Oral:

1. This matter has been brought before this Court, it appears on a misconception of the petitioner with regard to certain acts, which he perceived as contemptuous.

2. Today, Mr. S. Jindal, learned counsel who is present as Legal Aid Counsel on behalf of the petitioner submits that the matter may be disposed of at this stage itself by closing the contempt proceedings.

3. Though, Mr. K.Ch. Gautam, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. K.V.E. Kharnongbak, learned counsel appearing for the respondents No. 2 and 3 have voiced their objections, this Court at this stage, hereby disposes of the Contempt Application by closing the same, without any further orders.

4. Matter accordingly stands closed and disposed of.

Judge Meghalaya 23.04.2025 “D.Thabah-PS”

2025:MLHC:313 Digitally signed by DARIHUN THABAH Date: 2025.04.23 06:17:47 IST Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead