Orissa High Court

WP(C)/28257/2026 of PRASANTA PRADHAN Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 11 September 2026

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.28257 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010659422026 Prasanta Pradhan & Anr. …. Petitioner(s) Mr. Ganesh Prasad Samal, Adv. versus- State of Orissa & Ors. …. Opposite Party(s) Mr. Tej Kumar, ASC CORAM: HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE SANJEEB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.28257 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010659422026

Prasanta Pradhan &

Anr.

….

Petitioner(s)

Mr. Ganesh Prasad Samal, Adv.

versus-

State of Orissa & Ors.

….

Opposite Party(s)

Mr. Tej Kumar, ASC

CORAM:

HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI

Order No.

01.

ORDER

11.09.2026

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.

2. In filing the present Writ Petition, the Petitioners claiming themselves to be landless, have sought for a direction from this Court to the Tahasildar, Rairakhol/ Opposite Party No.3 for settling the disputed property in question vide Sabik Plot No.1281/13, Sabik Khata No.61 area measuring Ac.1.80 decimals corresponding to Hal Khata No.122, Hal Plot No.1934, area measuring Ac.1.80 decimals, Mouza-Barabank under Rairakhol Tahasil in the district of Sambalpur in their favour.

3. Heard learned counsel for the Parties. Digitally Signed Signed by: AYASKANTA JENA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 11-Sep-2026 16:36:03 Signature Not Verified

Page 1 of 2

4. During course of hearing, learned counsel for the State submits that instead of preferring this Writ Petition, the Petitioners, at the outset, should have ventilated their grievances for the above purpose before the Tahasildar, Rairakhol/Opposite Party No.3.

5. At this juncture, learned counsel for the Petitioners prays for granting permission to the Petitioners to ventilate their grievance before the Tahasildar, Rairakhol/Opposite Party No.3.

6. Considering the submissions made on behalf of both the parties, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case of the Petitioners, directs the Petitioners to approach the Tahasildar, Rairakhol/Opposite Party No.3 along with a representation for the above purpose within a period of fifteen working days hence. In such event, the Tahasildar, Rairakhol shall look into the grievance of the Petitioners and pass a lawful order on the above issues within a period of four weeks thereafter.

7. This Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

(Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge Ayaskanta Digitally Signed Signed by: AYASKANTA JENA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 11-Sep-2026 16:36:03 Signature Not Verified

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead