Orissa High Court

CRLMP/1409/2026 of ANANDINI DASI HEREDIA @ ANANDINI DASI Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 11 September 2026

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No.1409 of 2026 (CNR No. ODHC010684072026) Anandini Dasi Heredia @ Anandini Dasi …. Petitioner Mr. S. Nayak, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha & others …. Opposite Parties Mr. S. Panda, ASC CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK Order

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CRLMP No.1409 of 2026

(CNR No. ODHC010684072026)

Anandini Dasi Heredia @

Anandini Dasi

….

Petitioner

Mr. S. Nayak, Advocate

-Versus-

State of Odisha & others

….

Opposite Parties

Mr. S. Panda, ASC

CORAM:

MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK

Order No.

ORDER

11.09.2026

01.

1. Heard Mr. Nayak, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Panda, learned ASC for the State.

2. Instant CRLMP is filed by the petitioner for a direction to opposite party Nos.1 to 3 to register the FIR on the basis of the complaint as at Annexure-1 series dated 27th December, 2024 on the grounds stated.

3. The allegation is against opposite party No.4 as made to reveal from the complaint i.e. Annexure-1 series. Mr. Nayak, learned counsel for the petitioner claims that no action has been followed even after intimation to the higher official, namely, opposite party No.2 vide Annexure-2. The submission is that the petitioner is an outsider and belongs to Argentina but is a resident of Bhubaneswar. It is claimed that in spite of the allegations in the complaint as per Annexure-1 series, there is inaction of the P.S. concerned, hence, the CRLMP. Mr. Panda, learned ASC for the State submits that the complaint i.e. Annexure-1 series is not addressed to opposite party No.3,

Page 1 of 2

hence, as it appears, no action could be taken thereon. But, on perusal of the said complaint, this Court finds the seal and date of the concerned P.S. thereon. Considering the above facts and the submissions of learned counsel for the respective parties and since it is claimed that the petitioner presented the complaint at the P.S. which bears its seal and date, hence, the endorsement of having received, this Court is inclined to direct opposite party No.3 to immediately attend to the same and act upon and if in case any cognizable offences are alleged to have been committed by opposite party No.4, to take appropriate legal action in accordance with law without further delay.

4. Hence, it is ordered.

5. In the result, the CRLMP stands disposed of with the direction as aforesaid for compliance by opposite party No.3 soon after receiving a copy of this order.

6. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules and in course of the day.

(R.K. Pattanaik) Judge

Alok Digitally Signed Signed by: ALOK RANJAN SETHY Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT Date: 11-Sep-2026 14:51:13 Signature Not Verified

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead