Orissa High Court

WP(C)/20392/2026 of PRASANTA DEHURI Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 11 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.20392 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010469022026 Prasanta Dehuri …. Petitioner Mr. S.K. Nath, Advocate on behalf of Mr. P.K. Mohapatra, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. Siba Narayan Biswal, Additional

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.20392 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010469022026

Prasanta Dehuri

….

Petitioner

Mr. S.K. Nath, Advocate

on behalf of

Mr. P.K. Mohapatra, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha & Others

….

Opp. Parties

Mr. Siba Narayan Biswal,

Additional Standing Counsel

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

11.09.2026 (Hybrid Mode) Order No.

01.

1. The Writ Petition has been filed with the following prayer:

“Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to; I) Issue Rule NISI calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the impugned order dated 11.06.2026 shall not be quashed and thereby quashing the impugned order dated 11.06.2026 under Annexure- 4 ; II) Direct the opposite parties to restore petitioner to the promotional post of Revenue Inspector with all consequential service and financial benefits; III) Pass such order (S) / direction (s) as deemed fit and proper in the bonafide interest of Justice; And for this act of kindness, the petitioner

Amit as in duty bound shall ever pray.”

2. Memo of date is filed by the learned counsel, Mr. Mohapatra which states thus:

“During pendency of the aforesaid case the benefits has already been extended to the petitioner as prayed for. Hence petitioner does not want to proceed the case and the same may be withdrawn as not press.”

(sic)

The memo shall be taken on record and scanned copy be updated.

4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo)

Judge

Digitally Signed Signed by: AMIT KUMAR MOHANTY Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 12-Sep-2026 10:42:35 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead