Orissa High Court

ABLAPL/6637/2026 of SAROJ KUMAR SAHOO @ MUNA SAHOO Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 11 September 2026

of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 6637 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010428592026 Saroj Kumar Sahoo @ Muna Sahoo …. Petitioner Mr. P.C. Jena, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. C.R. Swain, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 11.09.2026 02.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No. 6637 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010428592026

Saroj Kumar Sahoo @

Muna Sahoo

….

Petitioner

Mr. P.C. Jena, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

….

Opposite Party

Mr. C.R. Swain, AGA

CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

Order No.

ORDER

11.09.2026

02. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No.284 of 2026 pending on the file of learned J.M.F.C., Odapada arising out of Motanga P.S. Case No.199 of 2026 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 111(2)(3)/ 111(4)/ 310(2)/ 317(3)/ 351(2)/ 61(2) of the BNS and Section of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 read with Section 51 of the Orissa Minor Mineral Concession Rule, 2016.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel that because of the conflicting business interest, the Petitioner has been falsely implicated. Hence, he may be protected by pre-arrest bail.

Page 1 of 2

4. It is further submitted that making similar allegations, Petitioner has been cited as an accused in number of cases.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail and submits that since Petitioner has criminal antecedents, he ought not to be released on pre-arrest bail.

6. Taking into account the nature of allegation and the punishment prescribed, it is directed that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioner shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper subject to verification of criminal antecedents other than the similar nature.

7. In the event the Petitioner has any criminal antecedents other than the similar nature, this order shall not be given effect to.

8. It is needless to state that the Petitioner shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation.

9. Additionally it is directed that the Petitioner shall appear before the jurisdictional police station once a month on such date and time to be fixed by the learned Court in seisin. Certification of such appearance shall be submitted to the learned Court in seisin.

10. Any violation of the condition shall entail cancellation in accordance with law.

11. The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of. U.C.C. as per rules.

(V. NARASINGH)

Judge Ayesha Digitally Signed Signed by: AYESHA ROUT Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 12-Sep-2026 13:55:17 Signature Not Verified

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead