Orissa High Court

WP(C)/29573/2026 of CHOUDHURY SATYABRATA MADANROY Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 11 September 2026

HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.29573 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010709302026 Choudhury Satyabrata Madanroy and others …. Petitioners Mr. J. Pal, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties Mr. T.K. Dash, A.G.A. CORAM: JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY ORDER 11.09.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.29573 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010709302026

Choudhury Satyabrata Madanroy and

others

…. Petitioners

Mr. J. Pal, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha and others

….

Opposite Parties

Mr. T.K. Dash, A.G.A.

CORAM:

JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY

ORDER

11.09.2026 Order No.

01.

1. Heard Mr. J. Pal, learned counsel for the Petitioners and Mr. T.K. Dash, learned Additional Government Advocate for State- Opposite Parties.

2. The additional affidavit and I.A. filed by Mr. Pal in Court are kept on record.

3. It is submitted on behalf of the Petitioners that, Pattamundai Municipality has now started construction of RCC retaining Wall in front of the private plot of Petitioners, without having any right over the same, causing hindrances to the ingress and egress of residents/occupants of Petitioners building.

4. It is further submitted that in this regard the Petitioners may be permitted to submit a representation to the Collector.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission, without expressing any opinion on the merits of contentions of the Petitioners, permitting the Petitioners to make a Digitally Signed Signed by: BASANTA KUMAR BARIK Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 11-Sep-2026 15:49:47 Signature Not Verified

Page 1 of 2

representation in writing ventilating their grievances to the Collector, Kendrapada (Opposite Party No.4) within a period of seven days from today and in such event, Opposite Party No.4 shall consider the grievance of the Petitioners and take decision in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks thereafter. If necessary, the Petitioners may be given an opportunity of hearing. Till such decision is taken by Opposite Party No.4, the construction of RCC retaining Wall over Plot No.1960, i.e. as per Item Nos.55, 56 & 57 of Tender Call Notice (NIT) dated 23.03.2026 of Housing and Urban Development Department, shall not be proceeded with.

6. The Petitioners are directed to serve certified copy of this order along with a copy of the writ petition and the additional affidavit along with their representation.

7. An urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

( B.P. Routray) Judge

B.K. Barik Digitally Signed Signed by: BASANTA KUMAR BARIK Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 11-Sep-2026 15:49:47 Signature Not Verified

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead