Orissa High Court
WP(C)/29342/2026 of DINABANDHU PARIDA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 11 September 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 29342 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010694242026 Dinabandhu Parida ..…... Petitioner (s) Mr. Maheswar Mohanty, Adv. -Versus- State of Odisha & Ors. .. .…. Opposite Party (s) Mr. Sonak Mishra, ASC CORAM: DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 29342 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010694242026
Dinabandhu Parida
..…...
Petitioner (s)
Mr. Maheswar Mohanty, Adv.
-Versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
.. .….
Opposite Party (s)
Mr. Sonak Mishra, ASC
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI
ORDER
11.09.2026 Order No.
01.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3. In filing this Writ Petition, the Petitioner alleged to be an encroacher has challenged the order of dismissal of the appeal dated 14.08.2026 passed by the learned Sub-Collector, Kamakhyanagar in Encroachment Appeal No.34 of 2026.
4. During course of hearing, learned counsel for the State, at the outset, submits that there is a clear statutory remedy of revision available under the O.P.L.E Act against the impugned order dated 14.08.2026. Hence, the Petitioner should approach the concerned Revisional Authority. Digitally Signed Signed by: LITARAM MURMU Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 11-Sep-2026 17:29:50 Signature Not Verified
Page 1 of 2
5. In such view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to entertain the prayer made in this Writ Petition. However, considering the request of learned counsel for the Petitioner, this Court permits the Petitioner to file a revision along with a petition for condonation of delay, if any, so also a petition for interim protection before the concerned Revisional Authority as per the provision under the O.P.L.E Act, within a period of fifteen working days hence. In such event, the said Revisional Authority shall conclude the hearing after providing adequate opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned within a period of three months from the date of filing of the Revision.
6. It is further directed that till the interim application to be filed by the Petitioner is taken up, no coercive action shall be taken against the Petitioner pursuant to the impugned order of eviction dated 20.04.2026 passed by the Tahasildar, Kamakhyanagar.
7. This Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
8. The certified copy of the impugned orders under Annexures-2 and 4 be returned to the learned counsel for the Petitioner, upon substituting the same with photocopies thereof.
1. ( Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi)
Judge Murmu Digitally Signed Signed by: LITARAM MURMU Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 11-Sep-2026 17:29:50 Signature Not Verified
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…