WP(C)/20904/2026 of SHYAMA MITTAL Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 11 September 2026

ORDER

11.09.2026

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. As directed, Mr. Lenka, learned Additional Government Advocate has obtained written instructions from the Sub- Collector, Panposh to the effect that the next date of hearing of the Revenue Appeal Case is fixed to 30.09.2026, wherein both parties have been called for personal hearing including the writ petitioner.

3. Such being the case, this Court finds no reason to keep the writ application pending any further.

4. Mr. Pati, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the Revenue Appeal initiated at the instance of the Additional Tahasildar is not maintainable. It is open to the petitioner to raise the question of maintainability before the Sub-Collector on the date fixed which, if raised, shall be considered in accordance with law. Shyama Mittal

.… Petitioner Represented by

Mr. M. Pati, Advocate

-Versus- State of Odisha &Others .… Opp. Parties Represented by

Mr. D. Lenka, Additional Government Advocate

Order No.

03.

5. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.

(Sashikanta Mishra)

Judge

Puspanjali Digitally Signed Signed by: PUSPANJALI GHADAI Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack. Date: 11-Sep-2026 17:32:21 Signature Not Verified