Orissa High Court

ABLAPL/10367/2026 of MOHAMMED AFROZ Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 11 September 2026

of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 10367 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010684362026 Mohammed Afroz …. Petitioner Mr. B. Jalli, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. S.K. Lenka, ASC ABLAPL No. 10489 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010701622026 Krusna Chandra Behera

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No. 10367 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010684362026

Mohammed Afroz

….

Petitioner

Mr. B. Jalli, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

….

Opposite Party

Mr. S.K. Lenka, ASC

ABLAPL No. 10489 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010701622026

Krusna Chandra

Behera

….

Petitioner

Mr. B. Jalli, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

….

Opposite Party

Mr. S.K. Lenka, ASC

CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

Order No.

ORDER

11.09.2026

01. 1. Since both the ABLAPLs relate to the same FIR, they are heard together on the consent of the parties and disposed of by this common order.

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

3. The Petitioners are seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No.895 of 2026 pending on

Page 1 of 2

the file of learned J.M.F.C., Jatani, arising out of Info Valley P.S. Case No.364 of 2026 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 109/ 303(2)/ 3(5) of BNS, 2023 read with Section 11(d)(e) of Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, 1960.

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioners that exaggerated allegations have been made in respect of offence as alleged under Section 109 of BNS.

5. It is submitted by the learned counsel that the Petitioner in ABLAPL No.10367 of 2026 has one criminal antecedent in which the Investigating Agency has resorted to the provision as contained in Section 35(3) of BNSS and the Petitioner in ABLAPL No.10489 of 2026 stated to have no criminal antecedent.

6. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail during the currency of investigation.

7. Taking into account the nature of allegations, it is directed that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioners shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper subject to verification of not more than one criminal antecedent of any nature.

8. If it comes to the fore that the Petitioners have more than one criminal antecedent of any nature, this order shall not be given effect to.

9. It is needless to state that the Petitioners shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation.

10. Accordingly, the ABLAPLs stand disposed of. U.C.C. as per rules.

(V. NARASINGH)

Judge Ayesha Digitally Signed Signed by: AYESHA ROUT Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 12-Sep-2026 13:55:18 Signature Not Verified

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead