Orissa High Court

BLAPL/8057/2026 of SANJAYA SAHU Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 11 September 2026

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.8057 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010593232026 Sanjaya Sahu & another … Petitioners Mr. M. Das, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha … Opposite Party Mr. M.R.Patra, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL) : 11.09.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

BLAPL No.8057 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010593232026

Sanjaya Sahu & another

…

Petitioners

Mr. M. Das, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

…

Opposite Party

Mr. M.R.Patra, Addl. PP

CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY

Order No.

ORDER(ORAL) : 11.09.2026

01.

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode).

2. This is the bail application U/S.483 of the BNSS by the petitioners for grant of bail in connection with Daringbadi P.S. Case No.

of

Page 1 of 3

corresponding to C.T. Case No.164 of 2026 pending in the Court of learned Special Judge-cum-Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Balliguda, for commission of offence punishable U/S. 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act, on the main allegation of possessing 15 Kgs of Contraband Ganja.

3. Heard Mr. Mahes Das, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. M.R.Patra, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in the matter and perused the record.

4. After having considered the rival submissions and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offence as alleged against the petitioners vis-à-vis the accusations sought to be brought against them and regard being had to their pre-trial detention of the

Page 2 of 3

petitioner in custody since 22.07.2026 with substantial progress in investigation and there being no similar criminal antecedents reported against the petitioners and keeping in view the other circumstances on record in entirety including the inherent right of the accused- petitioners to be presumed innocent until proven guilty at the trial and the trial being not likely to commence very soon and lastly, no material being collected to suggest that the petitioners would abscond or pose threat to the prosecution witnesses, if released on bail, this Court without expressing any view on merit admits the petitioners to bail.

5. Hence, the bail application of the petitioners stands allowed and the petitioners are allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) each with one solvent surety each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions except cash surety as deem fit and proper by it.

6. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules. A soft copy of this order be immediately communicated to the concerned Court, who shall afterwards communicate the same to the concerned Jail through e-mail for reference.

(G. Satapathy)

Judge Manoj Digitally Signed Signed by: MANOJ ROUT K Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT Date: 11-Sep-2026 17:55:26 Signature Not Verified

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead