Orissa High Court

WP(C)/29633/2026 of THE BRUKSHYA SANRAKHYAN TRUST, BHUBANESWAR Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 11 September 2026

of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.29633 of 2026 [CNR No.ODHC010699472026] The Brukshya Sanrakhyan Trust, Bhubaneswar …. Petitioner(s) Mr. Gopal Prasad Jena, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Party(s) Mr. Debasish Nayak, AGA CORAM: HON’BLE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.29633 of 2026

[CNR No.ODHC010699472026]

The Brukshya

Sanrakhyan Trust,

Bhubaneswar

….

Petitioner(s)

Mr. Gopal Prasad Jena, Adv.

-versus-

State of Odisha & Ors.

….

Opposite Party(s)

Mr. Debasish Nayak, AGA

CORAM:

HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI

Order No.

01.

ORDER

11.09.2026

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.

2. By filing the present Writ Petition, the Petitioner, the Brukshya Sanrakhyan Trust, represented by its President Sri Surasen Mallick, has prayed for the following reliefs: “In the aforesaid facts & circumstances, it is humbly therefore prayed that, the Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit the writ application and issue RULE NISI calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the appropriate writ/writs in the nature of mandamus or any other suitable writs should not be issued to quash the Annexure-3 issued by the BMC and direct the Opposite Parties not to demolish the Asbestos House constructed by the Trust with

Page 1 of 2

poor contribution from its members when the said Asbestos House is not causing any inconvenience to the public and also has not encroached upon any public Road and the said lane is also not a passage for public. And in case, the Opposite Parties fails to show cause or show insufficient cause, the said Rule Nisi may be made absolute and upon hearing the parties through their counsel, this Hon'ble Court be further pleased to issue appropriate writ/writs in the nature of MANDAMUS or any other suitable writs to quash the Annexure-3 issued by the BMC and direct the Opposite Parties not to demolish the Asbestos House constructed by the Trust when the said Asbestos House is not causing any inconvenience to the public and also has not encroached upon any public Road and the said lane is also not a passage for public.”

3. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

4. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the respective parties and the averments in the Writ Petition, this Court directs the Petitioner to vacate the land/space in question, which has been constructed upon Government land, within one month from the date of this order. Failing compliance, the concerned authorities shall be at liberty to take appropriate action against the encroachers.

5. In view of the above, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

6. Pending application (s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

7. Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per Rules.

(Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge

Sipun

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead