Orissa High Court

WP(C)/28855/2026 of SATYANANDA PANDA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 11 September 2026

of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 28855 of 2026 CNR No.ODHC010670762026 Satyananda Panda ..... Petitioner Mr. S.K. Das, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Sahoo, ASC Mr. S.K. Patra, Adv. (for Accountant General) CORAM: THE HON'BLE

Page 1 of 2.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 28855 of 2026

CNR No.ODHC010670762026

Satyananda Panda

.....

Petitioner

Mr. S.K. Das, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha & Ors.

.....

Opposite Parties

Mr. P.K. Sahoo, ASC

Mr. S.K. Patra, Adv.

(for Accountant General)

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

11.09.2026 Order No. 01

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for Petitioner and learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties.

3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “Under the above circumstances, it is therefore humbly prayed that the Hon’ble Court may be graciously pleased to direct the Opp. Parties to revise the pay of the petitioner in the pay level-9 of the pay matrix under ORSP Rules, 2017 as he was in receipt of the grade pay of Rs.4200/- in the 3rd RACP as it evident from the Government order dated 27.04.2026; And further the Hon’ble Court be pleased to direct the Opp. Parties to refix the pay and pension of the petitioner in the enhance rate in the pay Level-9 under ORSP Rules, 2017 and to grant him the differential arrears, within a stipulated period as deem fit and proper;

Page 1 of 2

Page 2 of 2. And/or pass any other appropriate writ/writs, order/orders and direction/directions in the fitness of the case; And for this act of kindness as in duty bound the petitioner shall ever pray.”

4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.2 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of her claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence.

5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No.2 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 2 be communicated to the Petitioner.

6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY)

Judge

Jyoti Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOTIPRAVA BHOL Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 11-Sep-2026 15:13:48 Signature Not Verified

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead