Orissa High Court

WP(C)/26825/2026 of PURNA CHANDRA SAHOO Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 11 September 2026

of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 26825 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010631692026 Purna Chandra Sahoo ..... Petitioner Mr. G.K. Nanda, Advocate on behalf of Mr. I. Sahoo, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. A . Tripathy, AGA CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.

Page 1 of 2.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WP(C) No. 26825 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010631692026

Purna Chandra Sahoo

.....

Petitioner

Mr. G.K. Nanda, Advocate

on behalf of

Mr. I. Sahoo, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha & Ors.

.....

Opposite Parties

Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

11.09.2026 Order No. 01

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties.

3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to:

(i) Issue an appropriate writ directing the opposite parties to sanction and disburse leave salary equivalent to ten months' unutilised earned leave in favour of the petitioner in accordance with Finance Department Memorandum No.60319/F dated 28.11.1977, Finance Department Memorandum No.55433/F dated 14.11.1986, Finance Department Memo No.CS-II-34/01-4533/F dated 27.09.2002 and Finance Department Memo No.7351/F dated 17.04.2003;

Page 1 of 2

Page 2 of 2.

(ii) Direct the opposite parties to release all consequential financial benefits along with statutory interest for the delayed payment;

(iii) Pass such other order(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.

And for this act of kindness, the petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray.”

4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No. 2 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence.

5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No. 2 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 2 be communicated to the Petitioner.

6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY)

Judge Sneha Digitally Signed Signed by: SNEHANJALI PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 12-Sep-2026 13:14:02 Signature Not Verified

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead