Orissa High Court

WP(C)/23153/2026 of NIYATI MOHANTY @ DAS Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 10 September 2026

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.23153 of 2026 ODHC010527112026 Niyati Mohanty @ Das …. Petitioner Mr. Bijaya Kumar Sahoo, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and others …. Opp. Parties Ms. Suman Pattanayak, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO Order No. ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.23153 of 2026

ODHC010527112026

Niyati Mohanty @ Das ….

Petitioner

Mr. Bijaya Kumar Sahoo, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha and others ….

Opp. Parties

Ms. Suman Pattanayak, AGA

CORAM:

JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO

Order No.

ORDER

10.09.2026 (Hybrid Mode)

01.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

The petitioner before this Court challenges the selection of the Opp. Party No.5 as Anganwadi Helper in Parulia-1, Anganwadi Centre in the district of Balasore and issuance of engagement letter dated 28.04.2026.

2. It is submitted that though the petitioner has approached this Court for redressal of her grievances, at this stage, the petitioner shall seek the available remedy of filing appeal against the selection and engagement of the Party No.5 before the appropriate authority.

Accordingly, it is submitted that the petitioner will not press the writ application in its present form. Digitally Signed Signed by: RAJESH KUMAR BADHEI Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 11-Sep-2026 14:54:37 Signature Not Verified

Page 1 of 2

3. Learned Additional Government Advocate in response submits that the petitioner may avail appropriate remedy available under law.

4. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Advocate, it is directed that the petitioner shall approach the appropriate authority by filing properly constituted appeal before the authority within a period of three weeks. The authority shall consider the appeal and shall take decision in accordance with law.

5. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion regarding the merits of the claim of the petitioner or the contentions of the parties to the writ petition.

The writ petition is disposed of with the above observations.

(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) Judge Rajesh

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead