Orissa High Court

CMP/47/2017 of BHARATI PATRA Vs SIMANCHAL PANIGRAHI on 10 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No.47 of 2017 [ CNR No. ODHC010301982017 ] Bharati Patra …. Petitioner Mr. Tutu Pradhan, Advocate -versus- Simanchal Panigrahi …. Opposite Party None CORAM: HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO Order No. ORDER 10.09.2026 04.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CMP No.47 of 2017

[ CNR No. ODHC010301982017 ]

Bharati Patra

….

Petitioner

Mr. Tutu Pradhan, Advocate

-versus-

Simanchal Panigrahi

….

Opposite Party

None

CORAM:

HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

10.09.2026

04. (Through Hybrid Mode)

1. The CMP has been filed challenging the order dated 17.11.2016 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Berhampur in C.S. No.403 of 2012 rejecting the petition filed by the Plaintiff for causing production of the record bearing Book No.4.

2. While issuing notice on 18.01.2017, the further proceedings of the suit had been stayed by this Court.

3. None appears for the Opposite Party when the matter is called.

4. Mr. T. Pradhan, learned counsel for the Petitioner files a memo stating that the suit has been dismissed for default on 10.12.2021 and as per the instruction of the Petitioner, an application under Order 9, Rule 9 of the CPC has been filed in the said Court. Hence, this CMP may be disposed of with liberty to the

Petitioner to revive this CMP in the event the suit is restored. The memo is taken on record.

5. As the civil suit has been disposed of in the meanwhile, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this CMP pending, which is accordingly dismissed.

6. Interim order passed earlier stands vacated. Misc. Case No. 54 of 2017 stands disposed of.

7. However, liberty is granted to the Petitioner for revival of the CMP or recall of this order, in case any cause of action still survives.

(Savitri Ratho)

Judge RKS Digitally Signed Signed by: RANJAN KUMAR SETHI Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK Date: 10-Sep-2026 19:56:22 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead