Orissa High Court

BLAPL/7380/2026 of KULJEETRAM KHARWAR Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 10 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.7380 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010538612026 Kuljeetram Kharwar … Petitioner Mr. M.Das, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha … Opposite Party Mr. P. Satpathy, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL):10.09.2026 01. 1. This

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

BLAPL No.7380 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010538612026

Kuljeetram Kharwar

…

Petitioner

Mr. M.Das, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

…

Opposite Party

Mr. P. Satpathy, Addl. PP

CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY

Order No.

ORDER(ORAL):10.09.2026

01.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This is a bail application U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Keonjhar Town PS Case No.565 of 2026 corresponding to GR Case No.1023 of 2026 pending in the file of learned SDJM, Keonjhar for commission of offences punishable U/Ss.331(4)/305(a) of BNS, on the main allegation of committing theft by trespassing into the house of the informant and taking away jewellery and valuables.

2. Heard, Mr. Manoranjan Das, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P. Satpathy, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor in the matter and perused the record. On being queried about the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, Mr. Das volunteers to withhold bail to the petitioner, if he is found to have any criminal antecedent.

3. After having considered the rival submissions and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offences as alleged against the petitioner vis-à-vis the accusations sought to be brought against him and regard being had to the pre-trial detention of the petitioner in custody since 18.06.2026 with submission of charge- sheet in the meantime and keeping in view the other circumstance on record in entirety including the inherent right of the accused-petitioner to be presumed innocent until proven guilty at the trial and the mode and manner of implication of the present petitioner in this case, this Court without expressing any view on merits admits the petitioner to bail, but subject to verification of his criminal antecedent.

4. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands allowed and the petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty- five Thousand) with one solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions except cash surety as deem fit and proper by it.

In view of the specific submission as advanced for the petitioner, the benefit of this order shall not be extended to the petitioner, if he is found to have any criminal antecedent.

5. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. A soft copy of this order be immediately communicated to the concerned Court, who shall afterwards communicate the same to the concerned Jail through e-mail for reference.

(G. Satapathy)

Judge

kishore Digitally Signed Signed by: KISHORE KUMAR SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 10-Sep-2026 18:56:01 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead