Orissa High Court
WP(C)/28758/2026 of ANITA NAG Vs STATE OF OF ODISHA on 10 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.28758 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010662762026 Anita Nag …. Petitioner Mr. S. K. Mishra, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. P. K. Sahoo, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER 10.09.2026 01. 1.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.28758 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010662762026
Anita Nag
….
Petitioner
Mr. S. K. Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. P. K. Sahoo, ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
10.09.2026
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for appearing for the Parties.
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “Under the above circumstances, it is therefore humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be graciously pleased to direct the 0pp. Parties to absorb the petitioner on regular basis from the date of her engagement as a Peon i.e. from October, 2023, as her husband was continuing for last 22 years in the said post and the persons those who were appointed along with the husband of the petitioner have been absorbed regularly that and to grant him all consequential service and financial benefits.
And/or pas any other appropriate writ/writs, order/orders and direction/directions in the fitness of the case.
And for this act of kindness as in duty bound the petitioner shall ever pray.”.
4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states
// 2 //
that highlighting her grievance, Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.2 vide Annexure-14 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection.
5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.2 to consider the representation filed by the Petitioner vide Annexure-14 within a period of three (3) months in accordance with law from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge Subrat/Utkalika Digitally Signed Signed by: UTKALIKA NAYAK Designation: Sr Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 11-Sep-2026 16:22:00 Signature Not Verified