Orissa High Court
WP(C)/28298/2026 of PRASANT KUMAR DAS Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 10 September 2026
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.28298 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010673942026 Prasant Kumar Das …. Petitioner Mr. M. Padhi, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. A . Tripathy, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER 10.09.2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.28298 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010673942026
Prasant Kumar Das
….
Petitioner
Mr. M. Padhi, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. A. Tripathy, ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
10.09.2026
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer: - “The petitioner, therefore, prays that Your Lordship's may graciously be pleased to admit the writ application, call for the records and after hearing the parties and issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari/Mandamus or any other or further writ/writs), direction/ directions directing the opp parties to grant RACP and one increment in favour of the petitioner basis on similar situated person who have joined with the petitioner in different districts i.e Jajpur, Balasore, Bhadkar, Cuttack and Bhubaneswar for the interest of justice.
And pass any other order(s), direction (s) as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper.
And tor this act of kindness the petitioner shall, as in duty bound ever pray.”
4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that through highlighting his grievances, the petitioner has filed a representation vide Annexure-4 to the Writ
// 2 //
Petition, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, she prays that a direction be issued to the Opposite Party No.3 to take a decision on the above noted petition within a specific time period.
5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs the Opposite Party No.3 to take a decision on the above noted representation in accordance with law, within a period of three (3) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the petitioner.
6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge Nitu Prava Digitally Signed Signed by: NITU PRAVA PRUSTY Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, Cuttack Date: 11-Sep-2026 16:13:09 Signature Not Verified