Orissa High Court

WP(C)/13792/2026 of PABITRA KUMAR PRADHAN Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 10 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 13792of 2026 ODHCO10299532026 CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA ORDER 10.09.2026 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. Government Advocate for the State. 3. The petitioner has

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 13792of 2026

ODHCO10299532026

CORAM:

JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

10.09.2026

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. Government Advocate for the State.

3. The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayer:- “Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, it is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to:

i) quash the impugned Notification, dated 19.06. 2025, issued by the Revenue & Disaster Management Deptt., Govt. of Odisha / Opp.Party No.l and thereby hold and declare that the Petitioner is the lawful owner of the Schedule property, with Sthitiban status (Not ''Patadar") and is entitled to all the rights and benefits of said property ;

ii) pass such other order(s)/issue direction(s) as may be deemed fit and proper in the Bonafide interest of justice; And for which act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound, shall ever pray.”

4. It is stated at the bar that the case of the petitioner is covered by the judgment rendered by this Court recently in the case of Pabitra Kumar Pradhan .… Petitioner Represented by

Mr. S. Seth, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha & Others .… Opp. Parties Represented by

Mr. D. Lenka, Addl. Government Advocate Order No.

02. Gargi Dash v. State of Odisha & Others (W.P.(C) No.2870 of 2026) & Batch.

5. Considering the submissions as above, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Tahasildar, Tangi to consider the prayer of the petitioner in light of the aforementioned judgment of this Court. A decision in this regard shall be taken within six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order by the petitioner.

(Sashikanta Mishra) Judge

B.C. Tudu Digitally Signed Signed by: BHIGAL CHANDRA TUDU Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 11-Sep-2026 16:29:50 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead