Orissa High Court
WP(C)/26213/2026 of SUSHANTA SAHOO Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 10 September 2026
g e IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C). No.26213 of 2026 ODHC010596352026 Sushanta Sahoo …. Petitioner Represented by Mr. M.M.Patnaik, Advocate -Versus - State of Odisha & Ors …. Opposite Party Represented by Mr. G.Mohanty, Standing Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA
1 | P a g e
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C). No.26213 of 2026
ODHC010596352026
Sushanta Sahoo
….
Petitioner
Represented by
Mr. M.M.Patnaik, Advocate
-Versus -
State of Odisha & Ors
….
Opposite Party
Represented by
Mr. G.Mohanty,
Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER_
10.09.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
3. The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayer: “It is therefore prayed that let this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash the order dated 22.01.2026 passed in Mutation Appeal Case No. 207 of 2003 by the Sub- Collector, Bhubaneswar under Annexure-1 and this Hon’ble Court further be pleased to direct the Opposite Parties No. 2 & 3 to consider the case of the petitioner after perusing the case records and all relevant documents for the ends of justice; And/or pass any other order/orders, direction/directions as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper for the ends of justice. And for this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.”
4. The order impugned can be challenged in revision as held by this Court recently in the case of Asutosh Mohapatra and Others v. Sk.Manwar Alli and others (W.P.(C). No. 24461 of 2025 & Batch Order No.
01. 2 | P a g e
disposed of on 31.03.2026).
5. The writ application is therefore, disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to prefer revision before the appropriate authority under Section 32 of the OSS Act. If such revision is preferred within fifteen days from today, the same shall be considered on merits.
(Sashikanta Mishra) Judge
Deepak Digitally Signed Signed by: DEEPAK PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: OHC,Cuttack Date: 11-Sep-2026 11:03:47 Signature Not Verified