Orissa High Court

BLAPL/7641/2026 of AKSHAYA KUMAR PATTANAIK @ CHANDAN Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 10 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.7641 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010545942026 Akshaya Kumar Pattanaik @ Chandan … Petitioner Mr. S.K. Bhanjadeo, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha … Opposite Party Mr. R.B. Mishra, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

BLAPL No.7641 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010545942026

Akshaya Kumar Pattanaik @

Chandan

…

Petitioner

Mr. S.K. Bhanjadeo, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

…

Opposite Party

Mr. R.B. Mishra, Addl. PP

CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY

Order No.

ORDER(ORAL):10.09.2026

01.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode).

2. This is a bail application U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Begunia PS Case No.210 of 2026 corresponding to TR Case No.92 of 2026 pending in the file of learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-Cum-Special Judge under NDPS Act, Khordha, for commission of offences punishable U/S.21(b) of the NDPS Act, on the main allegation of possessing 34.10Grams of Brown Sugar.

3. Heard, Mr. Sanjib Kumar Bhanjadeo, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R.B. Mishra, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor in the matter and perused the record.

4. After having considered the rival submissions and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offences as alleged against the petitioner vis-à-vis the accusations sought to be brought against him and regard being had to the pre-trial detention of the petitioner in custody since 19.05.2026 with framing of charge in the meantime and taking into account the other circumstances on record in entirety including the inherent right of the accused-petitioner to be presumed innocent until proven guilty at the trial and no material being collected to suggest that the petitioner would abscond or pose threat to the witnesses, if released on bail, this Court without expressing any view on merits admits the petitioner to bail.

5. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands allowed and the petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) only with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions except cash surety as deem fit and proper by it.

6. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. A soft copy of this order be immediately communicated to the concerned Court, who shall afterwards communicate the same to the concerned Jail through e- mail for reference.

(G. Satapathy)

Judge

Subhasmita

Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHASMITA DAS Designation: Sr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 10-Sep-2026 20:03:24 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead