Orissa High Court

BLAPL/7778/2026 of BASANTA SARAF Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 10 September 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.7778 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010567962026 Basanta Saraf … Petitioner Mr. P. Panigrahi, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha … Opposite Party Mr. M.R. Patra, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL) : 10.09.2026 01. 1.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

BLAPL No.7778 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010567962026

Basanta Saraf

…

Petitioner

Mr. P. Panigrahi, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

…

Opposite Party

Mr. M.R. Patra, Addl. PP

CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY

Order No.

ORDER(ORAL) : 10.09.2026

01.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

1

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This is a bail application U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Bissamcuttack P.S. Case No. 55 of 2026 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 115 of 2026 pending in the file of learned JMFC, Bissamcuttack, for commission of offences punishable U/Ss. 305(a)/331(4)/317(2) & 3(5) of BNS, on the main allegation of receiving stolen gold and silver ornaments.

2. Heard, Mr. Panchanan Panigrahi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.R. Patra, learned Addl. PP in the matter and perused the record.

3. Admittedly, the petitioner was granted bail by this Court in BLAPL No. 4893 of 2026, but subject to verification of his criminal antecedent for not more than two criminal antecedents, however, the petitioner was found to have more than two criminal antecedents and accordingly, the benefit of the said order was not extended to the petitioner. Further, the petitioner is in custody since 20.04.2026 and in the meantime, charge sheet has already been submitted. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and on consideration of materials placed on record and taking into account the offences alleged against the petitioner being triable by Magistrate and thereby, applying the law laid down by the Apex Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vrs. Central Bureau of Investigation; (2022) 10 SCC 51, this Court without expressing any view on merit, admits the petitioner to bail.

4. Hence, the bail application of the Petitioner stands allowed and the Petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-five Thousand) only with one solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions except cash surety as deem fit and proper by it.

5. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules. A soft copy of this order be immediately communicated to the concerned Court, who shall afterwards communicate the same to the concerned Jail through e-mail for reference.

(G. Satapathy)

Judge

S.Sasmal Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHASMITA SASMAL Designation: Sr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 10-Sep-2026 20:14:50 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead