Orissa High Court

WP(C)/27931/2026 of ANIL KUMAR TANDI Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 10 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP (C ) No.27931 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010664512026 Anil Kumar Tandi …. Petitioner Ms. K. Patra, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. A . Tripathy, AGA . CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WP (C ) No.27931 of 2026

CNR No. ODHC010664512026

Anil Kumar Tandi

….

Petitioner

Ms. K. Patra, Adv.

-versus-

State of Odisha & Others

….

Opposite Parties

Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA

.

CORAM:

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

10.09.2026

1.

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid

Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for appearing for the Parties.

3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- In view of the facts and grounds stated above, it is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to: Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the Opp. Parties to release arrear salary and all consequential service benefits in favour of the Petitioner for the period from 28.07.2018 and 18.04.2020 ( 1 years 9 months) along with admissible interest; Direct continuity of service with notional benefits for seniority, experience and promotional prospects, treating the entire period as duty; Pass such further order(s)/direction(s) as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice. And for this act of kindness the Petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.

// 2 //

4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting his grievances, Petitioner has made a representation available at Annexure-6 to the Writ Petition before Opposite Party No.2 and the same may be directed to be considered and disposed of within a stipulated time period to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection.

5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, dispose of the Writ Petition with a direction on Opposite Party No.2 to consider and dispose of the representation vide Annexure-6 in accordance with law, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of this order with due communication to the Petitioner.

6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Sangita

Judge

Digitally Signed Signed by: SANGITA PATRA Reason: AUTHENTICATION OF ORDER Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 11-Sep-2026 19:48:12 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead